December 02, 2008
Login
|
Register
Home
News
Getting Started
FAQ
Bob's Sanity Check Blog
Symphony Of Greed
Blogs
SEC/Gary Aguirre Cover-Up
Forums
FOIA Data
Experts Speak Out
Dr. Byrne & Journalists
Dr. Byrne Slideshows
Slideshows
Podcasts
NCANS
NCANS Wall Of Letters
Library
Important Articles
Lawsuits
Complaint Resources
Links
About this Website
Resources
Search
Introduction To NSS
Latest News
Send Out the Search Party; Financial Press Missing in Action
1/7/2008 11:43:51 PM
STOCKGATE TODAY: US Court provides Free Pass on Possible Collusion
12/20/2007 4:40:01 AM
Prime Broker Defense; The SEC Made Us Do It
7/25/2007 3:31:51 AM
Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud
7/21/2007 12:54:31 AM
Overstock Ruling Favors Public Companies Across Nation
7/19/2007 6:58:33 AM
Registration Required
Welcome to the Sanity Check forums. You are welcome to browse the public forums, but you must be a registered user to post. If you are not a registered user, then
please register
. If you are a registered user, then
please login.
Can't contribute to a forum?
You must be a registered user to post on these forums.
Click here to register now
. If you are already registered,
click here to login
.
The Sanity Check Forum
Search
Forum Home
Specific Stocks
Novastar Financial, Inc (NFI)
Hedge Fund Laws...
Hedge Fund Lawsuit 2 of 2
mhatmccane
409 posts
Joined
1/20/2006
Hedge Fund Lawsuit 2 of 2
Posted: 14 Apr 06 9:18 PM
LAWSUITS TARGET NAKED SHORTS - II
by:
smoothjazz0204
04/13/06 04:10 pm
Msg: 422846 of 423128
Sometimes, especially with illiquid or highly shorted stocks, there is an imbalance, and the shares "fail to deliver." If the trader executes the short sale without possession of the shares, that is known as naked short-selling.
Hedge funds have grumbled for years about paying high fees for hard-to-locate stocks only to find that they were never delivered, even after the trade was executed. The crux of Wednesday's lawsuit isn't that naked short-selling is bad, it is that traders are being taken advantage of by a vast conspiracy among the prime brokers to keep up this façade of phantom trading while charging high fees for no service.
"Defendants effectively operated in a tag-team fashion--rotating in the roles of prime broker, clearing agent or counterparty that enabled the short sale transaction to go forward without the expectation of delivery," the complaint says.
Representatives of the banks named as plaintiffs in the suit either had no comment or did not return calls seeking comment.
The complaint does not name money damages for ETG, but it does put the time period from April 2000 to the present. The complaint also doesn't mention specific short sales for which ETG was charged a fee but the shares were not delivered.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has been studying the issue of naked short-selling and even instituted new regulations in January 2005 that require the stock exchanges to report stocks that routinely fail-to-deliver. Companies like Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia and Overstock.com have been on the so-called SHO list practically since the beginning. Overstock.com Chief Executive Patrick Byrne has tried to put a spotlight on naked short-selling.
Attorneys not connected with the Entwistle or Milberg firms say the suits could potentially hit Wall Street for billions of dollars if the accusations of collusion and unfair pricing can convince a jury that damages are warranted.
And the issue could attract the attention of state and federal regulators, as hedge funds increasingly manage money for pensions and other institutions who manage money for ordinary investors.
Posted as a reply to:
Msg 422845
by smoothjazz0204
Page 1 of 1
Specific Stocks
Novastar Financial, Inc (NFI)
Hedge Fund Laws...
Flat View
Tree View
Oldest To Newest
Newest To Oldest
Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check
|
Privacy Statement
|
Terms Of Use