Funny Bunny
Looking for something a little lighter?
Catch Bob's more irreverent and amusing pieces in his Funny Bunny Blog.

Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post

Location: Blogs Bob O'Brien's Sanity Check Blog    
Posted by:   bobo 2/15/2006 11:16 PM

(NOTE: It was correctly pointed out to me that FinancialWire confirmed the story before the NY Post came out with it. publishing their story yesterday morning. Apologies to FinancialWire for that sin of omission.)

The NY Post just released an article by Roddy Boyd, that confirms what I wrote about on Sunday Evening – the DTCC has been served with subpoenas by two states, in the developing naked short selling crisis.

Here is a portion of the article, cited under fair use, with attribution, which can be viewed at the NYPost.com website with a free membership:

NAKED SHORTING TARGETED


By RODDY BOYD

February 16, 2006 -- Two state securities regulators have issued subpoenas to get at the trading records of Wall Street's largest firms in a quest to stamp out the controversial practice of naked short-selling, sources said.

Naked shorting — the tactic of selling shares short without properly borrowing them first in order to bet on a stock's fall — has been a concern of state securities regulators during the past year.

Utah and Connecticut regulators' first line of attack will be to get Wall Street firms' trading records via the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, which tracks and settles all stock trades. Regulators will be looking for the trading and customer ledgers of Bear Stearns, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, which all have large and highly lucrative clearance operations.

Connecticut's subpoena asked for information on four companies "with a strong connection to the state," sources said.

Utah, on the other hand, requested a large amount of market-wide data regarding alleged naked short sales. “

It should be noted that Roddy and I do not see eye to eye on many things, and I have been critical of him, and he of me. I’ve been called sloppy, lazy, dishonest…and that was when he still liked me. The story, however, is the story. And it is now confirmed. I wouldn't have described naked short selling the way Roddy did - I tend to say, "Naked short selling is an illegal manipulative trading sheme - the process of defrauding investors out of their money by taking their cash, and failing to deliver the product - shares." But everyone's a critic, and opinions are like...well...

This is especially amusing as Weiss has now publicly embarrassed himself twice, when he ignored that TheStreet.com denied knowing about a formal SEC investigation into Rocker and Gradient at the time of the article which he claims broke the story (and which he claims I was rehashing with my breaking of the actual formal investigation blog from yesterday), and where he also derided me as a lunatic who prints fantasies, when I broke the DTCC story here on Sunday night. Gary, honey, you are in the deep end of the pool without a floatie. I, a rank amateur, got the story right 3 full days ahead of the nearest news source, while you garbled it, claimed it was all a lie and an invention, and insulted me as a fraud and a charlatan. And now we have confirmation that it was true. You are looking like a huge putz, my friend, so I would quit while you are behind – nobody is fooled at this point.

Online, the message boards have had full time crews posting that I was a liar and a cheat, a nut, krazeeee as the day is long, for making the claim about the DTCC being subpoenaed by the states.

Just as they have also been saying I was lying about Rocker Partners, while touting Weiss' blog every third post.

So now we have the confirmation on the DTCC, which ends this little vignette, and trashes Weiss’ minimal credibility, while substantiating mine. Say what you will about the bunny, but so far, he’s called these plays correctly.

Next, I would expect we will see a “soft” breaking of the Rocker news over the next few days, something like, “We received a standard, computer generated form, nothing to worry about, blah blah blah…”

Which will be the second part of this week’s news confirmed.

But it still leaves the question unanswered, which is, did he tell his investors, and his network of bankers and other hedge funds? I don’t know if he legally has to, but I would sure want to know, if I was in bed with him. I would also be thinking long and hard about Byrne being the guy who turned over his affidavits and other material to 7 state and federal agencies, and the new revelations about subpoenas – wanna bet that is just the prologue to what will happen after March 1? I think that it is safe to say that the brokers involved in this are going to be getting proctology exams, along with the hedge funds. Couldn’t happen to nicer fellas.

Now as to the story of the mobbed up guys doing a number on a journalist acquaintance, which was told to me by Dr. Byrne and later confirmed in writing, that happened, and is not a fiction, any more than the rest of these stories are fictions. They aren’t. They are the truth, and there has been a tremendous effort to attack the messenger, and paint me as an unreliable source of info.

But if you had read this blog, you would have heard about all of this 3 business days before the mainstream media got to it.

So the bad guys have a little problem now – credibility has been shredded for their current mouthpiece, and these stories are turning out to be accurate. That is not good for them. Traffic is setting records here at The Sanity Check, people are talking, and the news is getting out.

And you heard it here first.

If I had to guess their next move, it would be another attack on my credibility, although they are out of time on that one, methinks. I am working on another piece titled, “O’Brien is an Asshole” which will seek to summarize their arguments and thinking, and will hopefully have it out by the weekend. I also have a piece from inside Businessweek, also provided by Byrne, which is pretty big news in terms of good dirt on Mullaney, as well as their alleged nifty little mechanism for creating click inflation for their online site – but who has the time to break all of this at once? That piece could well cause heads to roll bigtime at BusinessWeek – Weiss’ alma mater, and Tim’s current roost. My hunch is that Terry McGraw is going to hemorrhage when he reads it, as he is an honorable man, and will freak at what is going on under his watch. And which will further serve to demonstrate that I am an asshole, at least in the eyes of the NY financial press.

Being the bunny is a full time job these days.

And as to the apologists who maintain that the naked short selling crisis is all in our heads, they have a little problem too - the states are now convinced enough that this is an issue to subpoena the DTCC - that is not a small move. And some of the largest houses on Wall Street are now part of the investigation. Next will come a hurried SEC response, if history is a guide - the states ALWAYS get there first, with the SEC gloming on once a blowup is inevitable.

Folks, it's been a long week, and it is only Thursday. I'm beat, and want to get some shuteye, and consider the events of the last 72 hours.

There isn't much more to say, but I think it's safe to close with a line that has become somewhat of a cliche for me on the message boards: this time it's different.

It is.

And I only have to be right about that once.

 

Copyright ©2006 Bob O'Brien
Permalink  |  Trackback
Comments (30)
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Anonymous on 2/15/2006 11:44 PM
The Easter Bunny, it keeps going, and going, and going.....................................
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Project142bob on 2/15/2006 11:54 PM
You notice how Boyd has to put in the little slam at the end about victimized companies having "abysmal earnings" and being under "intense regulatory scrutiny" . As if there was any doubt about who's dictating what he can write about. Thank you again EB. I have deeply sincere gratitude for all you are doing
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Chasity on 2/16/2006 5:22 PM
What now Patchie?

Re: 2/16/06 - [Elgindy] Newsflash: Real claims plummet by more than 90%.

To: Man on the moon who wrote (92429) 2/16/2006 7:51:50 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific of 93893

NEWSFLASH!!! NEWSFLASH!!! NEWSFLASH!!!

Title above and text below in Anthony's own words
SI Bob

IT'S OFFICIAL!

As of this very second, the government has admitted that the former prosecutor's claims, gains of $12 million, were fictitious and bogus.

Real claims plummet by more than 90%.

Stay Tuned Folks!

Anthony

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22176166
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Patchie on 2/16/2006 6:03 PM
Chasity..

It must me true what you say --- it is posted on silicone investor by Anthony Elgindy? LMAO

Wanna provide a shred of real evidence. I think a federal conviction carries more weight than a post by teh convicted. BTW.. Where is the press now proclaiming how innocent Elgindy was and how he was wrongly convicted?

Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By InTheKnow on 2/17/2006 5:38 AM
Chastity,

I think your wearing your belt in the wrong place!
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By pepe on 2/17/2006 1:12 PM
Hadn't the Governor of these 2 states (Utah & CT.) signed on to the dtcc's campain to do away with paper certificates & use electronic markers only in the trading of securities? I thought I heard that AZ. was the only holdout.
Hope this issue comes to light to as The DTCC cannot be trusted!
pepe
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By bobo on 2/16/2006 12:09 AM
No worries. Roddy is working in NY, where there are political realities that must be addressed. Some might say that this was merely a soft breaking of a story that would go big anyway. I take more of the position that for the first time we are seeing real acknowledgement by the regulators, and the media (if grudgingly) that naked short selling is real, is a problem, and isn't going to go away.

There is a hell of a book here, that's for sure.....maybe I should bother to finish mine....
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By rvac106 on 2/16/2006 1:14 AM
Just put a gratuitous link to this item over on Cuban's Blogmaverick, in response to an anonymous dig at Bud Burrell. Waste of time I'm sure, but I did get to plug the Boyd article in the Post. Spread the wealth, eh?

RVAC
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By InTheKnow on 2/16/2006 2:24 AM
People sometimes come to their senses and report a story that has wide reaching ramifications just to make amends for their past deeds.

It's time for Gary Weiss to make a decision to come over to the real world and not that of some of the psycho posters pervading his blog (we all know who they are, even if he doesn't).

As for BlogMaverick I guess billionaires are exempt from any semblance of rational decisions and couldn't care less about what kind of crap they put on their blogs just as long as it satisfied their egos!



Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By adegracia1950 on 2/16/2006 2:49 AM
Keep up the good work bunny.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By stormchaser on 2/16/2006 5:04 AM
This scandal is too immense and the ramifications too reaching to not be shown the light of day.It sadly shows the depth of greed and corruption that pervades our markets and politicians.Wall Street is one of if not the biggest contributor to local and national PACs...No wonder the regulatory agencies have been totally ineffective...why kill the golden cash machine.....
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By mhelburn on 2/16/2006 7:56 AM
I can see why a New York journalist might be hesitant to blow the cover on this. When you tie in the threats that are being reported and there have been others in the past. The late Robert I. Friedman was threatened for his work. Google him.
It is too bad that most people won't understand Roddy's expose except for his naming the firms involved. That is a coup, although I would have been surprised if anyone of the firms listed had been left off. Goldman has been getting a little positive mention on how they have been co-operative in trying to clean things up inside. A dustbuster perhaps isn't the best tool after a hurricane.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By troydian on 2/16/2006 8:21 AM
There is a large # of folks that have watched this saga unfold over the last few years, that Know this reality of fraud. It is High time this crime on a grand scale,comes full circle. With the TRUTH being told to the masses. I hereby grant the Easter Bunney all my accrued merit to use in defending the TRUTH!! Peace Troy<
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Patchie on 2/16/2006 8:49 AM
You really have to chuckle at good old Roddy. You have to wonder whether there is a little bi-polar in him.

"It's Real - It's not Real"; "It's Illegal - They Deserve it".

The last line jibe in the article was not only inappropriate to the article - it was a flat out bogus statement. Roody has pidgeon holed this issue once again to a certain segment of the market and totally avoids the very fact that the Regulation SHO list potrays both strong and weak companies and companies who have been raided by the markets, by the media, and by the regulators FALSELY.

Is TASR still under investigation? Nope, just a little vindictiveness by the SEC to support the short sellers.

How about OSTK, do we have an investigation into that management? Nope but the bad guys are being investigated.

Martha Stewart, Netflix we hearing anything about them? Martha had her little scandal several years ago now but that didn't even have anything to do with MSO and yet they have been on the list 100% of teh time. By Roddy's theory the NYSE should have tanked as she was on the Board of the NYSE.

Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By mhelburn on 2/16/2006 9:42 AM
Many of the companies purportedly under attack from naked short-sellers are often under either intense regulatory scrutiny or have posted abysmal performance for long periods of time.>>

1. Maybe they are under attack by illegal and manipulative trading ( Wonder why the investigation?)
2. Those under regulatory scrutiny or have posted abysmal performance for long periods of time are under attack by illegal and manipulative trading
3. Maybe those that aren't under regulatory scrutiny or have posted superior performance are under attack by illegal and manipulative trading

My point is that this is illegal.. except for market-maker exemptions and if the market maker exemptions are being abused, the market makers should lose the privilege.. That's a novel idea!!! Why allow someone who has abused the system have the same privileges as those who don't? The honest brokers would have a sizeable advantage over those that cheat if the exemption were taken from those who get caught.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By frogman29 on 2/16/2006 9:53 AM
EB, many thanks for your exceptional investigative work. I am looking forward to learning more as your expose continues.
This kind of work should inspire someone within the financial press corp to get onboard and tell more. However, the Men in Black may have already had a bit of a chit chat with those in the media who could do any harm to the bad guys. Intimidation perhaps? I am reminded of Ross Perot.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By I wonder how this my tye in to the fray on 2/16/2006 10:27 AM
http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/ChronDataBreaches.htm
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By mhelburn on 2/16/2006 10:51 AM
That is a very good point. Wonder if during these breeches, someone sets up a fraud account and extracts the proceeds of a transfer in and is able to mask the movement of funds. Someone that is sophisocated enough to get through the security, surely could move money around. It wouldn't necessarily have to be from someone else's account.. or could be moved through someone else's account. In.. out.. balance the same.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By ginger on 2/16/2006 11:45 AM
Unbelievable !!!

I'm watching this with interest.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Chasity on 2/16/2006 11:52 AM
Bob and Patch,

Why dont you try and find a brokerage which will let you naked short Overstock's stock. Just think about it. If you could naked short overstock you could prove your bogus theory.

I for one would appologize to you.

So how about it. Find any brokerage in the World that will let you open up a account and naked short Overstock or for that matter any stock.

Prove your point once and for all.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By bobo on 2/16/2006 12:12 PM
Uh, it has already been proven, chastity. Goldman was just fined for naked short selling. RYCO was caught doing it for 3 of their hedge fund customers.

I don't have $300 million to open an account with them, and get favored hedge fund trader status, so I will have to go with those being caught red handed.

You are funny. I can cite examples where the brokers are caught red handed doing it, and you just pretend those don't count. Ever hear of FBR? Knight? REFCO? No?

Do you think the states are going up against the DTCC for fun?

Did you not hear Rod Young's testimony, where Smith Barney was failed for 200+days in Eagletech? No? How about Byrne's inability to get shares for months?

Sorry, you need to change your shtick. That one doesn't play, and it is coming apart. The question is not does it happen, the question is now how big is the crisis?
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Patchie on 2/16/2006 12:32 PM
Chasity (love the name),

Are you daft? they don't naked short for the small retail guys - we aren't worth the risk. Now a $1 trillion Hedge Fund Industry that can bring in revenues from every orifice, when they say short you say "yes sir" and deal with the actual settlement later.

As for the evidence, I guess the recent enforcement cases (Elgindy, Scott Ryan, FBR, Mangan, Pollet, Shane, etc...) were just isolated. As Bob pointed out Ryan did it ON BEHALF OF three hedge funds. Today there was an article about Refco and their settlement problems (ponzi scheme one guy called it).

If you don't believe Wall street would cheat for a Hedge Fund go back and read up on the.....MUTUAL FUND scandal. It was all about giving Hedgies the illegal advantage. When caught the regulators came down hard on Wall Street but few Hedgies paid any fines. Kinda puts in perspective where the SEC stands on Hedge Fund enforcement. Can you say greased palms?
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Kevin on 2/16/2006 12:35 PM
If there is anyone who should be first in line presenting a subpena to the DTCC, it should be Iliot Spitzer. I guess even those that are thought to be ethical have their price, and Attorney General is not his last stop.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By rtway1 on 2/16/2006 12:45 PM
Chasity, you don,t have to apologize, just open your eyes and read real proof, not some blog crap that is paid for. Remember this affects all of us at all levels of life, one way or another. The public always winds up getting the screw in the end, for the massive greed of a few. Phillips or slotted, it,s the same old screw.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By rtway1 on 2/16/2006 1:07 PM
Has Spitzer ever handled a case that handed down real jail time? It seems like it always ends up in fines, which is just the cost of doing business for fraudulent traders and hedge funds.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By kalalau73 on 2/16/2006 2:04 PM
Many are cheering Boyd's journalism. I say he's still a hack.

He stole his info from Bunny's scoop without attribution. What a creep.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Chasity on 2/16/2006 2:20 PM
Patchie,

Elgindy was not found guilty for naked shorting. Are you saying he was?
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Patchie on 2/16/2006 2:28 PM
Chasity,

I believe the best response to that question can be answered by Kenneth Breen or Matt Goldstein (thestreet.com) who interviewed US prosecutor Ken Breen after the trial. According to Breen, the prosecutor had evidence that Elgindy had engaged in naked short selling of over 40 Companies.

Not my words...Not Matt's words..the US Prosecutors words.
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By Project142bob on 2/16/2006 2:51 PM
Chastity, your agenda is transparent at this point. i.e. ignore numerous other damaging facts, pick one as a red herring and attempt to obfuscate the truth.

Thanks for keeping it interesting though, seriously
Re: Easter Bunny Turns Out 100% Right on DTCC Subpoenas, Confirmed by NY Post By investor2006 on 2/16/2006 4:30 PM
omg it is you acccadacca....... "And I only have to be right about that once."


holy crapoli, it really is you.


i just hit the nail in the head didnt I?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Please limit your comments to 500 characters. For longer comments, use our forums.
Subscribe via Email
Get This Blog via Email:


Powered by Squeet.com
Sanity Check Archive
Resources
Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use