-------------------
Sign the Market Reform Petition Now!: View it here.
------------------
So, last week, Patrick did an interview for MN1.com wherein he discussed his feelings about NSS, his company's saga, etc. etc.
It's a good listen, as he has never sounded more common-sense. There are some startling revelations about the international community's take on things, which differs dramatically from the US press (wow, where have we seen that before?).
It goes by pretty quickly, and doesn't require a lot of time, so if you can, check it out.
---------------
In other news, a lawsuit was just filed against PGWC.
The press release detailing the suit can be read here.
Why is this newsworthy? Well, if you recall, a large class action was filed against NFI predicated entirely upon the largely false and misleading information contained in a WSJ article.
This suit is predicatedupon the questionable info contained in a Motley Fool article written by Seth Jayson - who has also been critical of a surprisingly large number of companies shorted by Rocker Partners and SIA, as well as of Patrick and anyone daring to comment about NSS.
Now, I'm not saying that Seth is a compromised quisling being used as a foil to influence the trading in targeted companies, nor that he is now stooping to releasing "news" solely to create an event for class action ambulance chasers to use to sue, creating "headline value" negative news.
No, I'm just saying that we saw the identical tactic used against NFI two years ago - WSJ regurgitates a bunch of false info (NFI pays more than it earns in dividends being my favorite) and Milberg is ready to go within 24 hours, right after Rocker bought many millions of put options set to expire worthless just a few weeks later, barring a serendipitous event like a 50% reduction in value caused by the aforementioned article and suit.
The SEC has fortunately never bothered to explore that remarkable timing/windfall profit generation by Rocker for any evidence of stock manipulation. No, they instead were busy prosecuting Martha, and delisting companies which had failed to make filing deadlines.
I will readily admit that having to use MF rather than the WSJ is a big move downstream, but ever since Milberg took some felony bullets to the chest it's been hard to get the same bang for the buck. Still, if you can cobble together articles "reporting" on accusations and innuendo and disseminate them via even slightly credible channels (I will leave it up to the reader to decide whether MF falls into that category), apparently you can work the same sort of scheme, if scheme it is.
Some things never change. Why would they? It's not as though anyone is doing anything about it...