Robert Shapiro issued forth a comment letter that is as comprehensive as it is coherent. It is a damaging indictment of a system run badly amok, and is required reading.
Anyone that hasn't signed the NCANS letter by either faxing a signature or emailing me their name and contact info at NCANS.mgr@gmail.com - please do.
---------------
SABEW issued forth an outraged, sanctimonious release condemning "pretexting" and stated in the strongest possible terms it should be vilified and pursued with unrelenting vigor.
Some examples:
"Such actions have a chilling effect on the journalistic process and thereby do harm to the public, investors and all of us who rely on the free flow of information. Such actions also compromise a reporter's ability to talk freely with sources. Sources in sensitive situations may fear retribution if their bosses, or other possible adversaries, could easily steal the phone records of inquiring reporters.
In addition, H-P's actions raise serious questions about the privacy and security practices at phone companies. In an age of concern about identity theft, the ease with which records were compromised is something that journalists ought to explore much more deeply.
Journalists possess the same rights as any other citizens when it
comes to the protection of their personal information. In addition, reporters' notes, phone records and conversations with their sources are protected in many states -- including California, where H-P is headquartered -- from searches or review even by law enforcement agencies.
California's Attorney General has publicly stated that a practice
known as "pretexting" -- faking a person's identity to gain their
personal information -- violates state privacy laws. If that is the
case, SABEW hopes violators face the full force of the law."
Wow. I hope they do too.
How about Dave Kansas, the head of SABEW and the editor of the C section of the WSJ, ask his employee Jesse Eisinger about using illegally obtained cell phone and bank records from NCANS - sort of as a warmup chitty chat, given all the outrage over this sort of thing? I mean, I suppose if someone sent me someone's cell records and an attorney-client trust account's bank records, I could assume they were legitimately obtained...especially if it was a "reputable" hedge fund that gave them to me....I mean, how else would you get them?
Or is it only bad if it happens to you? Sort of a, hey, we do it, but that's different?
SABEW. Where discussions about how to crush your critics using the courts, obstruct justice by concealing evidence, and a bevy of other admirable topics are the stuff of their annual meetings, and where your members can do that which you condemn, and not an eyebrow is raised.
Quite a group.
---------------------
Go, Chewbaca, Go!!!!
That's sort of the reaction I've had to the latest ahubiddy hubbidy responses from everyone's favorite hack. I hesitate to devote any more real estate to the ongoing revelations as to the madness of 'lilGW, but it is a slow day, so why not?
Check out this latest from Antisocialmedia, a blog devoted to exposing 'lilGW as pathological. I haven't seen any credible refutation, thus assume it is what it is until proved otherwise.
Not a lot has to be said. I actually enjoyed some of the ironic turns of phrases. It is well written, and jabs one of our biggest critics with a very sharp and precisely targeted stick, which I celebrate, although in the way that I celebrate something marginally and momentarily interesting as I flip channels.
Perhaps it is all some big mistake, where the explanation is, "I was editing the comments emailed me by...oh....er...um..that was something else....so the wikepedia stuff is all being edited around me, all me, all the time....uh....that doesn't mean that I'm doing it....it could be a team of folks who believe I'm the best thing ever and have a library of my important decade old magazine articles.....and the IP thing? uh....there's many possible reasons for that....or if not, there could be...for instance, it could be that is a dynamic IP that keeps changing, and that all those "different" posters....er....got them as part of the marvelous mysterious workings of the universe.....uh......baloney! Baaaaloneeyyy!!! What's important isn't these absurd allegations, what is important is that this is all designed to avoid the real questions...and...er...they're all kooks, I tell you....this is all stock scamming pumpers anyway...uh...Chewbaca.....Chewbaca! Cheeeewbaaaacaaa!!!"
--------------------
Short but sweet, is Mr. Allison's comment to the SEC:
"As Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote in the April 1862 edition of The Atlantic:"We want a state of things in which crime shall not pay."
This is manifestly NOT the case under either the present or proposed rules."
I don't really have any questions. That about sums it up. Nice to see we've made such progress over the last 150 years or so.