It seems like only a handful of NY-published journalists are able to write a coherent, impartial story on the naked short selling issue. Is it really that difficult? Apparently not.
Here is a good one from Las Vegas.
The writer quotes the DTCC's Thompson, who misleadingly argued that shares aren't lent in a serial fashion - of course his argument was that the same broker couldn't relend the same share, not that the new owner, who had been delivered the share to settle a failure, couldn't redeposit it with the NSCC to be lent again. Sort of a lawyerly way of framing the question so that it appeared to address the issue, but in fact, didn't.
Anyhow, it is clear to me that more folks are figuring this out as we go along.
Now, let's get some more signatures for the NCANS letter to the SEC , huh? If you haven't already faxed me your signature at 702 946-0934 or emailed me a statement indicating I can affix your name to it, please, do so. Just send me an email with your name and contact info, and I will affix your name to the PDF sent to the SEC as support for the letter - but keep your contact info private.
NCANS.MGR@Gmail.com
We only have a few more days. Do your part. Take out 20 seconds and make a statement.