UPDATE: The WSJ just broke the story that the SEC's limp-wristed registration requirement couldn't stand. Big deal, I say, as no crook with three working brain cells would register anyway...too many loopholes...but this is a nice indicator of the SEC's overall competence in crafting a rule that would stand up to challenge. Wanna bet the Grandfathering would be ruled unconstitutional in a heart beat? Ladies and gentlemen at the SEC, you gotta know that will be coming at you soon, so don't act shocked when the whole house of cards comes tumbling down...
----------------
This came out in the NY Times today. Speaks to the integrity of the fine folks over at the SEC, and all the hard work they have done to protect investors from predatory, powerful special interests operating in the markets with impunity:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/23/business/23fund.html
So, let me see if I have this right. You work at the SEC. Your job is to stop miscreants from stealing the retirement wealth of the nation, and to bring them to justice. You have the temerity to demand to speak to a rich, powerful, politically connected guy key in all of it, and you find yourself out of a job.
Nice.
Wow. So, yesterday we have the revelation that OSTK's fails mushroomed to 25% of the float while Reg SHO was "working", and now we see that the SEC's top brass can't fire guys who are asking embarrassing questions of Wall Street royalty quickly enough.
Is it just me, or is this whole thing not only coming apart, but seeming to stink to high heavens the more we hear?
I really, really can't wait to see the Senate hearing next week, and further can't wait to see discovery in the NFI case.
Oh, and here is a snippet from the Financial Times, about prime brokers trying to dump their liability to large hedge funds, now that it is becoming obvious that the debt is a cancer ready to metastasize.
"Another data-point on tightening hedge fund credit
In recent weeks, an investment bank has reportedly been trying to sell several billion dollars worth of the loans it has extended to hedge funds. The idea behind this putative sale, which seems to be the first of its kind, is that the risk in this lending would move from the prime broker to a wider investor pool. And the members of that pool would include more, er, hedge funds.
Not to mention investment banks, bank banks, insurance companies and various other insatiable consumers of potentially excitable but largely inscrutable securities.
You sort of read it here first. And in somewhat more detail in my column in the Jun. 5 edition of MAR/Hedge. And NakedShorts just can’t wait to hear how Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and chief evangelist of the Church of Keeping Up With Exotic Paperwork, feels about having tunnzmore of the stuff floating about the hedgefundosphere and its immediate environs."
For the full article, click the link below - sorry, but you have to be a subscriber to read the full article...
Prime brokers selling hedge fund exposure marks watershed
by Gillian Tett
The Financial Times
Jun. 23 2006