Check this out - an honest piece of journalism by a non-NY press member. How surprising. The Philadelphia Inquirer delivers the goods.
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/business/14405833.htm
The article speaks for itself, and is one of the better ones I've seen covering the topic of naked short selling.
For those who dispute that it exists, or is predatory, I would suggest that you read this twice.
Disseminate this far and wide, people, and congratulate the reporter on a job well done.
------------
And here's some fun reading on why Spitzer is not taking any action against hedge funds in spite of their obvious impact on Wall Street and alarming penchant for larceny:
http://www.nydailynews.com
"Eliot hedges bets
By DAVID SALTONSTALL
DAILY NEWS SENIOR CORRESPONDENT
Sunday, April 23rd, 2006
Attorney General Eliot Spitzer may be known as the "sheriff of Wall Street," but there's at least one group of high rollers - hedge fund managers - that he's happy to ride sidesaddle with, records show.
The Democrat's campaign for governor has collected nearly $1 million from hedge fund honchos in the past year, according to a Daily News review, drawing complaints from GOP foes that he is taking money from a rarefied Wall Street subset over which he has regulatory oversight.
"An attorney has an ethical duty to avoid even the appearance of impropriety," said Andrea Tantaros, a spokeswoman for Bill Weld, one of Spitzer's Republican rivals. "Revelations that Mr. Spitzer is raising money from firms that he is arguably regulating seems to raise serious issues about his ethics."
There is more, but you should probably go to the site to read it...
And you should also read this piece:
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2002/1209/072_print.html
Why anyone would believe a word that comes from anywhere near Wall Street is really the question, no?