Another hedge fund filed a massive suit against the brokers, for naked short selling - and this is just the tip of the iceberg, folks.
Read all about it in Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/2006/04/20/quark-fund-0420markets14.html?partner=msn
So the practice that doesn't exist, or does at a very minor level, but isn't a problem, is now front page news, and battle lines are drawn between industry factions who want to apportion blame.
Huh.
That is a lot of very knowledgeable people suddenly, and virtually overnight, claiming that they have been wronged by a billion dollar practice that just days before most were denying exists.
I wonder if they all just found out about it the same day?
Is it possible that they have known all along, and see that the whole ugly mess is going to be revealed, and so want to be first in line to point the finger at someone else?
What do you think?
When does the first suit on behalf of investors hit - that would be the approaching a trillion dollar one?
From the article:
"More lawsuits against prime brokers are expected, and many observers who are not connected with the pending litigation say regulators are likely to investigate prime brokers' roles in contributing to naked short selling.
"What we are seeing today is the beginning of a seismic change in the securities lending business," says Josh Galper, managing principal of Vodia Group, in a research report."
Kind of makes the Market Reform Movement look just a little ahead of its time, no?