Funny Bunny
Looking for something a little lighter?
Catch Bob's more irreverent and amusing pieces in his Funny Bunny Blog.

A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing

Location: Blogs Bob O'Brien's Sanity Check Blog    
Posted by:   bobo 3/27/2006 4:00 AM

As the continuing story of market manipulation unfolds, and as it becomes increasingly obvious that some hedge funds and some members of the media are in hot water, I thought it might be helpful to create a primer for those folks to use when they are caught red-handed. In the venerated manner of all Wall Street crooks and most politicians, these techniques are accepted, and well understood – but are only as effective as your ability to look sincere and keep a straight face.

Additionally, if you are a journalist, you can insist that "the man" is trying to "put a chill" on your important work, which may well include colluding with hedge funds so they can make billions at the expense of the public. But we are trying to keep this generic, so have left that self-explanatory technique out of the mix

It helps if you are a sociopath, as well, but given the target audience for the primer that is a given.

In my own simple way, I use the example of a man caught stealing a pig - clearly guilty, and being confronted by the police, pig prominently clutched under his arm.

So here are the top ten ways to handle your difficult situation:

news.GIF

1)      Deny everything, and act puzzled. You aren’t stealing a pig. There must be some confusion.

 

news1.GIF

2)      Claim to be a victim of something. Race, religion, politics, whatever. Remember, you are not stealing a pig, you are a victim of oppression.

 

news2.GIF

3)      Attempt to convince the accuser that he is a moron, and has it all wrong, has bungled the true definition of the problem. Any claim will work here, no matter how outlandish – remember to be forceful, and if you can, re-define the problem.

 

news3.GIF

4)      Create an argument over semantics.

 

news4.GIF

5)      Argue that you are simply following established norms, and should not be singled out for persecution. This isn't about pig stealing, it is about driving a few miles over the speed limit...

 

news5.GIF

6)      Refuse to answer any queries, insisting that it is beneath you, or that you aren’t required to on account of your unique standing or importance in the industry/community.

 

news6.GIF

7)      Argue from authority. You are important, and far above pig stealing. You don't even fit the profile of a pig stealer. Have fun with this one.

 

news7.GIF

8)      Baffle them with bullshit. Argue that you can’t have stolen the pig, as there is no such thing as steal, or pig, in your lexicon/reality. Terms like moral relativism are helpful, as are existential abstracts, or nihilism.

 

news8.GIF

9)      Insist that the charges are incorrect. There can’t be any pig-stealing going on, as there are rules against doing so. Same as the naked short selling argument advanced by the apologists for the practice - it can't be going on, as the rules forbid it.

 

news9.GIF

10)   Change the terms of the accusation – you aren’t stealing, you are liberating. You aren’t counterfeiting, you are increasing liquidity. You aren’t defrauding people, you are combating other frauds. Be creative. Again, it doesn’t have to be believable, you just have to be committed to repeating it as though it was truth.

Copyright ©2006 Bob O'Brien
Permalink  |  Trackback
Comments (28)
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By mfairvew on 3/27/2006 9:24 AM
Can you make your next amorphous drawing look more like Cuban? LOL
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By shananana on 3/27/2006 9:28 AM
Bad haircut and sibilant lisp? You could cut and paste a dead cat onto his head, and make the wrist a little limp.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By troydian on 3/28/2006 6:05 AM
the sec says it it underfunded.understaffed ect..... why then are they spending so much resources on investigating some of the very important people that have put this issue in the spotlight??
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By BR on 6/26/2006 8:20 AM
I am trying to find the article referenced by above... can anyone post the link and the name of the article that Dave referenced: For example:

“NSCC does not have the authority to execute buy-ins on behalf of its members. Moreover, forcing close-outs of all fails can increase risk in clearing and settlement as well as potentially interfering with the trading and pricing of securities.”

They don't have authority to execute buy-ins on behalf of a member that is owed stock, because that would involve BUYING IN THEMSELF. The NSCC is the ONLY ONE who owes shares to the member that is net long.

There are other members who owe the NSCC stock, but that is a separate unrelated issue. They don't want to buy those members in because they didn't ask for enough collateral (102% of the current low shorted price) and if the member declares bankruptcy, then the NSCC has to eat the loss.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By SqueezeTrigger on 3/27/2006 9:32 AM
Thank you for this, Bob. Keep up the great work! The truth is getting out and while it is comical to us it is not a laughing matter for the media and the miscreants. Wait, is that the title of your next book? The Media and The Miscreants, by The Easter Bunny.....
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By bburrell on 3/27/2006 9:32 AM
Extremely well done. Kudos. Anyone want to argue here for the Power of Satire?

Keep it up. For those of you who are too young to remember the Junk Bond Scandal, all the bad guys used all the same arguments, including playing the religious persecution card. I agree with mfairview that you need to try and use a Cuban look alike for your scum character.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By mhelburn on 3/27/2006 9:33 AM
We don't make money on the stock borrow program. But don't ask about the stock lending program.

Dividends vs. payment in lieu. Dividends are paid on share entitlements. Share entitlements are posted to cash accounts.. ask Patrick's broker. The client gets what he is supposed to get..except he has a bogus share in his account.

All of the normal assumptions about how it should be are wrong. If their mouths are moving, they are lying.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By mfairview on 3/27/2006 9:43 AM
Forgot one.

"Oh yes I am stealing this one pig". What's the fine? 10 dollars?

Meanwhile thinking (please don't look in my UHAUL where you'll find a moose, a pair of llamas, 5 ostriches, and enough goats to feed a small village in indonesia)
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By bobo on 3/27/2006 10:17 AM
Jeff Mathews' latest is basically a variation of a number of these - what, is it illegal to collude with researchers so our short position makes money? Please. You say it like it is stock manipulation.

Of course, Jeff is named in the Biovail suit, page 72 I believe, so he may not be completely impartial...
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By dave on 3/27/2006 10:31 AM
Bob, you could have fun with the new DTCC mascot "pig @ dtcc".

http://www.dtcc.com/Publications/dtcc/index.htm

Mary, you could be onto something. I wonder why they call their "stock lending program" a "stock borrow program".

They seem to really lie through using technicalities.

For example:

“NSCC does not have the authority to execute buy-ins on behalf of its members. Moreover, forcing close-outs of all fails can increase risk in clearing and settlement as well as potentially interfering with the trading and pricing of securities.”

They don't have authority to execute buy-ins on behalf of a member that is owed stock, because that would involve BUYING IN THEMSELF. The NSCC is the ONLY ONE who owes shares to the member that is net long.

There are other members who owe the NSCC stock, but that is a separate unrelated issue. They don't want to buy those members in because they didn't ask for enough collateral (102% of the current low shorted price) and if the member declares bankruptcy, then the NSCC has to eat the loss.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By ginger on 3/27/2006 10:32 AM
You forgot the goatee.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By bobo on 3/27/2006 11:00 AM
Goatee? On the pig or the perp?

What the hell is wrong with you people? Move along. There's nothing to see here.

I mean, it isn't like the SEC could just subpoena the trading records immediately before the research reports were published and see if SAC or Rocker or whoever were establishing large positions.

Nah. That would be way too obvious. Better to argue over journalistic privilege for a few months while the shredders are working overtime...
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By golden1101 on 3/27/2006 11:06 AM
LMAO . . . Best thing I have seen in weeks. Very clear what is taking place.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By RJ on 3/27/2006 11:13 AM
Well, if you ask me, the pig farmer deserved it. He was losing money on the pig, after all. He kept buying feed for it, saying he was "preparing it for market", but that's really just an excuse for losing money. That pig had never earned him a cent.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By RJ on 3/27/2006 11:22 AM
Hey, I just thought of another one. He wasn't really stealing the pig. He was just borrowing it to replace one that he had sold but didn't actually have.

Am I getting the hang of it?
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By robelita on 3/27/2006 11:31 AM
Bing RJ-you've reached the state of nirvana!
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By Thekoolaidkid on 3/27/2006 11:39 AM
This pig was stolen in December 2004. I have billions more just like it. This pig is grandfathered and so are his children.

If this was a new pig I would have 3 days to decide whether to settle this trade or not. And then another 10 before settlement would be seriously required. Are you new to this beat?
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By robelita on 3/27/2006 11:56 AM
People are starting to get my drift when I talk about air-shares (aka NSS). Look out Michael Jordan-the bunny brigade knows how to play hoops!
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By robelita on 3/27/2006 1:20 PM
LOL-now CNBC is "discussing" hedge funds. Henru HU of the U of Texas made a faux paux when hes said people can now look up the criminality of fund operators then quickly added if there is anything there-too much fun.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By InTheKnow on 3/27/2006 1:22 PM
What stolen pig? This is an entitlement. You wanna buy it?
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By jcline on 3/27/2006 1:31 PM
I can see it now......... B"O"B"O" PIGS for sale on Overstock.com.....

It's all about the "O"
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By browntrout on 3/27/2006 1:46 PM
You all got it wrong. That ain't no pig! That's his girlfriend! Look at the lipstick marks. Good practice for prison.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By hawlw3 on 3/27/2006 3:02 PM
What is the going price for a pig?
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By msucog on 3/27/2006 10:55 PM
can you have him roll up his sleeves, go bald and yell a lot? and then have him push a button that says "squeal like a pig boy! SELL! SELL! SELL! so my hedge fund buddies can make more money at the expense of the individual investor."?
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By Granny on 3/27/2006 11:10 PM
You forgot to mention that if you get caught stealing a pig you must quickly close down your subscription only pig stealing newletter.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By mfairview on 3/28/2006 1:44 AM
Just read Matthew's latest. Is he really trying to spin the 60 minutes piece? These guys are getting delusional. If his "investors" are that stupid, they deserve what they get.
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By STORMCHASER. on 3/28/2006 5:02 AM
I called the AG office last year and to my surprise an investigator returned my call....I asked about naked short selling and why the AG ( SPITZER ) wasn't going after the bad guys...after all..you couldn't get a more high profile case than the biggest scandal to hit Wall Street in a hundred years. His response was '' It's a practice they dont want to stop "....my point....If the government is complicit in the systematic rape of its own people...what hope do we have here to right this financial debacle........
Re: A Primer for Members of the Media, and Hedge Funds, Accused of Wrongdoing By bbhindyou on 3/28/2006 5:06 AM
I think I just entered the twilight zone.Did any one else see the mad show last night the 27th.Did cramer say shorting hurts the small investor did he say Byrne may be RIGHT about some things.I was in bed watching I think I fell asleep it was a dream right?I'm scared it sounded like he was repentent.Its the end of the world as we know it.

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Please limit your comments to 500 characters. For longer comments, use our forums.
Subscribe via Email
Get This Blog via Email:


Powered by Squeet.com
Sanity Check Archive
Resources
Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use