October 07, 2008     | Register

Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud

Location: Blogs Mark Faulk's Blog    
Posted by:   mfaulk 7/21/2007 3:21 AM
In a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate today, Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT) called for Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd to conduct a hearing into stock market fraud, specifically addressing the issue of naked short selling. Sen. Bennett has been a long time proponent of stock market reform, and was instrumental in proposing a Senate Banking Committee hearing into naked short selling as early as late 2004, which were eventually shelved by then Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL). He said that Sen. Dodd, who has entered the 2008 Presidential election, was willing to conduct a hearing into the issue:

“I think it is serious enough that we ought to have a hearing about this in the Banking Committee, and I have spoken to the Chairman of the Banking Committee, Senator Dodd, and asked him if it wouldn’t be possible for us to have much of a hearing at some point in the future, and he’s expressed a willingness to do that. I can understand, we can’t set a time for that right now. There are too many other things going on in the Banking Committee, but I’m delighted to know that he’s willing to cooperate with us in examining this. And I would like to suggest several things that I would like to discuss at that hearing.”

A source close to the issue said, “Senator Bennett has spent an enormous amount of time studying this problem, he’s intimately familiar with the abuses in the stock market. This speech is his opening salvo.” He went on to say that “We need an avalanche of letters and emails from every state in the Union going to every member of the U.S. Senate, urging Sen. Dodd, the chairman of the Banking Committee, to hold the hearing on Sen. Bennett’s recommendations.”


trading or stock Senate Republican Conference Podcast - Naked Short Selling Senate Floor Speech
After first explaining the basic issue of naked short selling to his fellow Senators, Sen. Bennett then addressed the SEC and the creation of the DTCC, and their role in trade settlement, and how the need for a system to facilitate trade settlement led to the creation of the DTCC, or the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation. He said that the while the DTCC is regulated by the S.E.C. that” I don’t think that last statement is true. I’m not sure that the S.E.C. has control over the DTCC. He then quoted from a Wall Street Journal article that said, “Almost all stock is now kept at the company central depository and never leaves there. Instead, a stock buyers’ brokerage account is electronically credited with the securities entitlement. This credit can, in turn, be sold to someone else.”

Then Sen. Bennett described how electronic settlement, which he called “replacing paper with electrons,” can “provide cover for naked shorting of the stock” because shareholders are given an electronic credit for the purchase instead of physical delivery of the shares. From there, he described how electronic trading, and the DTCC’s practice of keeping shares in what has become known as the “DTCC Borrow Pool,” invites manipulation of the system:

“So this happens: a short seller enters the market and says, “I want to short—I want to sell 1,000 shares of XYZ stock so at some point he has to produce 1,000 shares to cover his sale. How do you do that? You borrow the shares. And then you buy them back at some future time. All right. From whom do you borrow them? The DTCC. They have all of the shares on deposit. So you go to the DTCC and you say, I want to borrow 1,000 shares of XYZ stock. They say, fine, we have them on deposit and will lend them to you so you can use them for your ‘short’ sale. All right, everything’s fine. Except that, in this electronic age, it is possible for you to keep shuffling around the electronic impulses that represent the stock and never, ever, have to buy it back. Stop and think about that, Mr. President. That’s a pretty good business plan. You can sell as much as you want and never, ever, have to pay for it. You could go in, the stock trading at $5 a share. You go in and sell 1,000 shares. You paid $5,000 for selling 1,000 shares and you never have to buy them. Because you are constantly moving around the electronic impulses that represent those shares. You never have to cover.

Now, when you talk to the DTCC people they say ‘No, we always make sure that there is a delivery and if there’s not, it’s not our fault. It’s not our responsibility to police this, it is up to the brokerage house to do this.’ The S.E.C. has spent enough time looking at this and enough time talking to me that they issued to me a three-page letter outlining the steps they have taken to stop the practice of ‘naked short selling.’”


After talking about recent rules implemented by the S.E.C. in an effort to deal with the problem of naked short selling, he talked about another method of circumventing the rules, a scheme that is commonly referred to as “stock kiting,” where two brokers pass shares back and forth between themselves, with each one holding the shares for thirteen days, the limit before forced settlement of the trade, and then passing it back to the other broker, where, according to Sen. Bennett, “they ping-pong these back and forth as long as they want. So you can have a situation where people are selling shares that don’t exist, taking commissions on the sale, and the profits of the sale, and never ever having to produce the shares.”

Bennett also said “I think a Congressional hearing is a good place for those who are running the DTCC to explain to us how it really works. And I would like the S.E.C. to come in and give us their background and information as to how their rules are working to try to stop the naked short selling.”

He laid out a number of proposals in his speech, including “a rule that says that brokers cannot borrow for short sales more stock than is on deposit with the DTCC. I think that’s just obvious. If there are 3 million shares of XYZ company on deposit at the DTCC, people should not be able to short sell 4 million shares…So my first recommendation would be that the DTCC cannot make available loans for short sellers more stock than they have on deposit. Once they have reached the point that 100% of the shares they have on deposit have been loaned out, they can’t loan out anymore. I think that’s just an obvious, commonsense recommendation, but it doesn’t apply now.” He also said, “there ought to be a rule that says that a broker cannot be paid a commission on a short sale until the shares are delivered.”

"It does not involve very many people, but for the people—to the people who are involved, it, frankly, can be a matter of life and death. And there are enough of them starting businesses and creating entrepreneurial activities in the United States that we owe it to them to find out exactly what is going on with respect to this.

That’s why I’ve asked Chairman Dodd to consider a hearing on this matter, to let us hear from the S.E.C., to let us hear from the DTCC, to let us hear from those in the marketplace who have actual experience with this and see if the present S.E.C. rules are sufficient or if we need to do additional things around the lines of the two items that I have suggested.”


Our anonymous source, who has spent years behind the scenes working for stock market reform, stressed that the hearing could hinge on the level of response from those who have been affected by stock market fraud, saying, “There’s been no bill introduced, but Senator Bennett is prepared to introduce a bill if these issues are not resolved. We need a nationwide campaign to get people to write their senators urging them to tell Sen. Dodd to hold hearings into the issues that Sen. Bennett addressed in the U.S. Senate today.”


TAKE ACTION NOW!!! WITHOUT YOUR HELP, WE WOULD NOT BE TALKING ABOUT THIS IN THE U.S. SENATE....WITH YOUR HELP, WE CAN FIX OUR STOCK MARKETS!!!

To contact your Senator, go to:
http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

To contact Senator Chris Dodd, go to:
http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3128&cat=Opinion

or write him at:
U.S. Senator Chris Dodd
448 Russell Building
Washington D.C., 20510

or:
U.S. Senator Chris Dodd
30 Lewis St Suite 101
Hartford, CT 06103
Permalink  |  Trackback
Comments (24)
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Anon on 7/21/2007 6:57 AM
Thanks so much for your unflagging efforts, Mark: you and numerous others may yet make a difference.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By iscorein4 on 7/21/2007 8:03 AM
I think the the following remark quoted from the above article speaks for itself.

Quoted from Senator Bob Bennett:

"I can understand, we can’t set a time for that right now. There are too many other things going on in the Banking Committee..."

SSDD (Same Shit Different Day!)
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Mark Faulk on 7/21/2007 8:45 AM
I disagree about the "SSDD" comment. If I thought it was that way, I wouldn't have hesitated to call BS on Bennett. After working with him "once removed" (meaning I've dealt directly with the person who has his ear) for the past two and a half years, I believe his efforts are entirely sincere. That's why I received the call to arms yesterday...they realize that public outcry is the best weapon we have to force Congress (and by extension, the SEC and DTCC) into action.

If we keep the pressure on....we'll get results. We have already accomplished a lot in the way of public awareness and debate, considering we're a bunch of nobodies. Get enough nobodies together speaking with one voice, and collectively, you're someone to be reckoned with.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By bemilio on 7/21/2007 9:28 AM
I agree with Mark Faulk the more people get involved the more pressure they get.
got example was the immigration bill they wanted to pass ,they already had it ready
but with people like michael savage and other talk show host the word got out
and people started to contact everybody they could and it did not went truth
that is the power to the people it is still there we just have to stick together and contact
as many as we can .we need Michael Savage or people like that that have huge listeners to spread the word more and more. maybe michael moore could make a movie about manipulation in stock market and how the SEC is involved and nobodys does anything about the hedge funds because money rules this days .

thank you for all the work Mark Faulk
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Mark Faulk on 7/21/2007 9:36 AM
This is entirely a team effort, I just get lucky and get a base hit now and then. If it wasn't for everyone who has responded to the call to arms, we'd be talking to the wall...and our country would be permanently screwed.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Mark Faulk on 7/21/2007 9:59 AM
One more point...on this particular "moment" the people behind it puts months of effort into making it happen, I just stayed up late and helped get the word out. There are so many people that no one even knows about working tirelssly behind the scenes. Someday after we win this thing, it will make a great story.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Patchie on 7/21/2007 2:14 PM
Mark, this was another great find and a great source. I can only wonder about how concerned the SEC must be getting. They are suddenly realizing they can no longer hide.

Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Sean on 7/21/2007 2:16 PM
Mark, I thought you may want to know about this, it may be a little off topic but helpful I hope.

http://www.stockwatch.com/swnet/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=Z-U:*SEC-1391298&symbol=*SEC&n...
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Sean on 7/21/2007 2:29 PM
More on topic a couple of weeks ago WSJ John Emshwiller (SP) wrote this article about the innfamous DTCC

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118359867562957720.html?mod=us_business_whats_news

The DTCC responded in kind within 3 days in their usual defensive posture!!
http://www.dtcc.com/news/press/releases/2007/wsj_response.php

Now this from Bennet ...Me thinks there is plenty of heat coming from the kitchen. Do we see a trend starting here.? Is mainstreet Media about to take on the big boys or what. We can only pray!!Thnaks Mark for your help and perseverance.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By summary on 7/21/2007 3:21 PM
Most readers know this, but for those that don't, here is a summary. The system is intentionally complicated.

1. The DTCC is a holding company. It owns several subsidiaries, including the NSCC and the DTC. The NSCC operates the "continuous net settlement system" (CNS).

2. Share ownership is evidenced by registration on the company's shareholder list. If your shares are electronic, they are likely registered to "Cede & Co.", a private partnership that acts as a nominee for the DTC. The ownership of Cede & Co. is not publicly available, but it existed as early as Oct. 12, 1971 when Senator Metcalf tried to identify who owned it.

3. The DTC keeps track of which brokerages have claims on the shares owned by Cede & Co. Only a tiny fraction of brokerages (less than 5%) have accounts at the DTC. The list of DTC participants is here: http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/membership/directories/dtc/alpha.pdf

4. These DTC participants or "clearing brokerages" clear trades on behalf of the introducing brokerages they provide back office services for. A lot of historic hanky panky (Adler Coleman, MJK Clearing which failed on Sept. 11, etc.) has been hidden by netting within the clearing brokerages.

5. If the clearing brokerage has a net obligation to another clearing brokerage, they enter that transaction into the "Continuous Net Settlement" system. At the end of the day, they have either a transfer in or transfer out amount for each equity. If possible, the shares are debited from one member's DTC account and applied to another. If it isn't possible, the system either uses a stock borrow or it allows the obligation to fail to deliver. By the time we are at this stage, 99.9% of the trades at the customer level have been netted. I would suspect it would be reasonable to say $1,000 of fail to deliver at this level could represent $1,000,000 of real trades that failed to deliver.

6. If the stock borrow program is used, the trades "recycle". If A lends to B, they can lend to C who can lend to D who can lend to E. One real share backs loans to B, C and D.

7. Often the clearing brokerages / prime brokerages find it advantagous to go "x-clearing". They just make side deals between themselves and don't necessarily worry about settlement.

8. How are foreign trades handled? If the trade happens in Canada, it goes through "Canadian Depository for Securities" who has an account at the DTC. If it happens in Europe, it goes through "Euroclear" or "Clearstream" who has accounts at the DTC. My observation is that shares rarely get transfered in or out of foreign depositories. They effectively trade only IOU's much of the time. These IOU's can push the price down here as US investors buy foreign IOU's.

9. The prime brokerages and foreign depositories hide phantom shares through "repurchase agreements". Rather than loan shares, which would expose them to regulations associated with stock loans, they sell the shares to the other brokerage, with an agreement to buy them back at a future date. This is effectively a collateralized loan, but technically they don't have to abide by stock loan legislation.

10. The repos are done at a cash basis, marked to market prices. Let's say a company's shares are driven down from $10 to one cent. Even if there are no shares available and buying them back would push the price back to $10, they still value them at one cent. There is no money in the system to back a rise in share price when they begin to cover and it would take very little covering to cause a domino affect of clearing brokerage bankruptcies.

11. These repo obligations tend to cancel out. Let's say prime brokerage 1 has a $billion obligation to prime brokerage 2 and prime brokerage 2 as a $billion obligation to brokerage 1. It works out that they owe each other $0 (it nets out). The two clearing brokerages are missing $2 billion of securities, but on their books it looks like they don't owe anything.

The whole thing is a mess with intentional larceny at every level. There are lots of historic examples of crimes (Refco), but no initiative by any regulatory agency to put an end to it. The reason is these are the same criminals that get them elected and bribe them with nice retirements.

It can and inevitably will be fixed as more and more people figure out what a joke the system is. If a casino in Vegas was run the way the stock market is, it would be shut down in 24 hours.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By summary on 7/21/2007 3:34 PM
This is a good read as are any of Richard Ney's books.

http://www.skepticfiles.org/socialis/robocit.htm

Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Sean on 7/21/2007 10:01 PM
Mark, whatever happend to the Grassley and Spector hearings with Gary Aguirre, and the Eagletech findings? Are both of them lost in the political filing draw??
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Browntrout on 7/22/2007 5:06 AM
Mark- Sen. Bennett talks about only one hundred percent of a company's stock at the DTCC should be lendable. I hope he was just simplifying his example. Years ago the only stock available for lending did not include pension and ERISA accounts. The street has somehow gotten around that as people are now being solicited to lend out shares in their IRA's, etc. Massive pension funds are also in the stock loan business. What happened to the old rules about stock lending?
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By bemilio on 7/22/2007 9:43 AM
here is the actual Conference

http://www.everyzing.com/viewMedia.jsp?index=4&start=0&mc=en-all&il=en&col=en-all-public-ep&q=trading+or+stock&res=14711810&num=10&filter=1&match=query,channel&dedupe=1&y=0&channel=41&x=0&e=7909995
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By iscorein4 on 7/22/2007 2:19 PM
Mark,

I understand why you don't like my SSDD remark. We all want this flagrant corruption and abuse to end. We are all worried that if the present system continues unchecked, the entire global economy could Humpty-Dumpty on us.

Perhaps I have just grown too cynical, but until we pull the real rotten tooth out, meaning the Federal Reserve Banking Sytem, it will just continue to abcess until it poisons the heart of our country and kills everything we hold dear..

The Fed was allowed to corrupt our system in 1913, and nothing has been the same since. That was 94 years ago, and still going strong. How can we ever hope to cure our ills when this malignant cancer is allowed to destroy us from within. If we can't even attempt to fix this most heinous of crimes perpetutated upon us, what makes you think cutting off a tentacle here or there will do any good. I think you're dreaming to believe we could ever fix this. It will take an open revolt and hanging the collective scum from the nearest gallows to fix this nightmare, IMO.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Mark Faulk on 7/22/2007 2:59 PM
iscore,

I agree with you on many levels, but I guess the alternative is impossible to accept....sit back and watch our economy, freedoms, and country get flushed down the drain? I don't think so. I'd rather feel as if I tried to do something instead of just standing by and watching helplessly. I have kids in the workplace now, and I don't want to just say "sorry we f*cked it all up."

If it takes an open revolt, then so be it.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Sean on 7/22/2007 5:52 PM
Mark , I have to also agree with Iscore. Although Patrick just got his favorable ruling about his case they (the miscreants) are still manipulating the daylights out of his stock. When do these guys get it and close up shop. Are they not scared of the consequences or are they that sure that like Scooter Libby they will be exonerated!!!
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By gregcable2002 on 7/22/2007 6:53 PM
To stand by and watch a crime take place and do nothing your no better then the criminal,send a letter or email,just don't sit and complain about it,every letter counts,listen,oue elected officials take notice of the letters sent through the regular mail more so then other ways of communication so take a few minutes to write a thoughtful letter.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Star the Wonder Pup on 7/23/2007 7:58 AM
As usual, mark, you are as dumb as a f--king rock.. And now you have the thoroughly corrupt bennett roped in.

FTD's are trivial. They are sand in the system. Or did you miss the global links issuance of the magic RS proof shares?
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By bobo on 7/23/2007 8:11 AM
Star, I think I can show you to be as ignorant and dishonest as you would like to pretend Mark is.

How do you know how large the FTD problem is? I mean, other than declaring it to be so? Do you have any empirical data to support your contention? Or do you simply do the GW shuffle, and get increasingly strident as you try to ignore things like the SIA's spreadsheet showing almost $100 billion just in the NYSE, at current mark to market?

Oh. That. Sand. $100 billion of sand, that represents more like $500 billion to $1 trillion. Of sand.

Even in hedge fund land, hundreds of billions adds up to real money. So how is that sand? Oh. Right. Because you say so. We should ignore Cox, who admits it is a serious issue. We should ignore the former undersecretary of commerce. We should ignore the academics. We should ignore the FOIA data. We should ignore Bennett. We should ignore former SEC investigator Aguirre. And listen......er......to you. I see. We are morons. You are smart.

Who are we going to believe, our lying eyes, or you?
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Jeremiah 9:24 on 7/23/2007 9:31 AM
Great News Mark et al., and thank you for making this public.

I intend to fax (not email) a letter to Chris Dodd and Mr. Bennett, cc'g my own "representatives" (one of whom is on the Banking Committee), insisting that the BC put this issue on the front burner.

I strongly suggest that everyone who cares about justice here do the same. Email is fine but a fax is even better, and calls to Dodd's office--and your home state senators--don't hurt either. Ask Dodd's office when we can expect hearings on the stock counterfeiting fraud. American citicens saw during the recent "amnesty for illegals" cramdown attempt what we can do when a significant number of us mobilize on an issue. A few hundred faxes and calls to Dodd's office backed up by a few hundred to your own senators will get them to pay attention.

Especially on the Democrat side, they would love to pin another scandal on the current administration--and a feckless at best and apparently corrupt leadership at the SEC might fit the bill.

The timing is good folks, let's let these 'representatives' know what their bosses want from them.
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By searrows on 7/23/2007 12:54 PM
Bemilio, I think you have a good idea although I'm not sure Savage will touch this he is the most likely of the talk show hosts to understand it. His audience is generally through with the two party system and for the most part objective and in total outrage with the system as it is now. I tried calling in but couldn't get through and his website doesen't take messages. Good Luck though, it would be great to hear him rant and rave about this!!!
Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By Sean on 7/23/2007 9:21 PM
The Tsumai cometh...

OSTK.. Federal Judges in the pocket?? Who would have thought?

http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_24957.shtml

Train Wreck of the Week
By Bob Chapman
Jul 23, 2007, 18:00


Building permits falling down, Bernanke's pill for the economy, OverStock.com suing brokerage firms, jail likely for Conrad Black, Virginia speeding ticket money grab, American assets being scooped up, credit derivatives bought and sold, bank risks "Train Wreck of the Week"

Home construction rose 2.3% in June, but building permit activity, a sign of future construction plans, fell to its lowest rates in ten years. Building permits fell 7.5% in June to a 1.406 million units.

Ben Bernanke’s delivery to Congress was pathetic and we predicted it would be - a moderate advancing economy and persistent inflation problems. It never occurred to Ben that he might tell us the truth. All he did was supply a verbal tranquilizer.


All the major brokerage firms are in serious trouble and the financial damages they’ll have to pay will be enormous if they lose the lawsuit brought against them by Overstock.com for naked short sales. Of course the SEC is nowhere to be found.

The California Superior Court for San Francisco has found Overstock.com and its co-plaintiffs have stated viable claims for market manipulation under California Securities Law for common law claims for conversion (stealing) and trespass to chattels, as well as for injunctive relief under California’s Unfair Business Practices Act against the defendant prime brokerage firms based on those defendants allegedly executing the shares of those companies’ stocks. The court granted the co-plaintiffs leave to amend their other claims of interference with advantage, to more specifically plead the factual basis of these claims.

The federal court system should have handled these cases, but because federally appointed judges are in Wall Street’s back pocket the plaintiffs had to go through state court. The SEC has done virtually nothing under “Show” and at that was forced to act by exterior forces. Let’s hope the plaintiffs win. These brokerage firms have been screwing the public for years.

Lord Conrad Black will get no special treatment to restore his citizenship or to return to Canada to serve a possible prison sentence. Canada’s jails for white-collar crooks are palatial compared to the US equivalent. In Canada lawbreakers can be paroled after serving only 1/6th of a sentence.

Black’s turncoat deputy David Radler, who lives in Vancouver, BC, will probably only serve six months in a county club jail for ratting out his old boss.

Moody’s has been excluded from 70% of new commercial mortgage-backed securities after toughening up guidelines. It has been shut out of nine of the past 13 deals as underwriters shopped for higher ratings from rivals. Normally they’d rate 75% not 30%.

Virginia has imposed huge new fines for driving 20 miles over the speed limit – up to $2,500. The fines are to finance road projects. As a result more than 100,000 people have signed a petition calling for the laws repeal. The 140 members of the legislature have been deluged with calls and e-mails from constituents threatening to vote them out of office if they do not ask the Governor to call a special session to reconsider the law. Criminal and civil penalties shouldn’t be created for raising money. This is nothing less than a tax increase and a bonus for insurance companies, who will raise rates on the speeders. Naturally the poor will get hit hardest.

As the dollar weakens foreigners are scooping up American assets. The Chinese and others are diversifying their reserves away from the dollar. Foreigners are not buying US assets because of a robust economy; they are buying to dump dollars, which are shrinking in value daily.

This is going to go on for years unless the US declares bankruptcy. In 2006 foreigners bought $147.8 billion of US businesses, up 77% from 2005. The Europeans dumped $109.9 billion, twice what they got rid of in 2005. Germany was the largest buyer at $22.7 billion. Middle Easterners spent $12.4 billion and the Japanese $8.7 billion. Have no fear the Chinese are on the way. Selling will turn into a tidal wave over the next few years as the dollar drops 35% to 50%.

Fitch Ratings’ global credit derivatives survey of 65 banks and insurers found that the total amount of credit derivatives bought and sold reached nearly $50 trillion at year-end 2006, an increase of 113% over the $23.4 trillion reported for year-end 2005. It also represents a 1,326% boost from the volumes of credit derivatives bought and sold in 2003, when Fitch first started the survey. Credit derivatives include credit default swaps, which allow investors to bet that a company can’t pay back its debt. They also include collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, which bundle together bonds, loans or other kinds of debt securities and sell notes that represent different levels of risk in the group. The levels of risk range from large triple A-rated tranches, which pay modest returns, to small-unrated equity tranches, which are most likely to be among the first defaults. Banks and broker-dealers dominate credit derivatives volumes, according to Fitch. Around 44 banks held about $24.6 trillion of the securities at the end of 2006, more than double the $11.3 trillion of volume at the end of 2005. 



However, a rising proportion of last year’s debt derivatives have low credit ratings, which means the banks are often holding securities that have a higher risk of defaults and difficulty in paying them back. At the end of 2006, 38% of the credit derivatives were speculative grade, meaning junk status, or unrated. That’s more than double the proportion of unrated credit derivatives in 2003, when they made up only 18% of the market. The banks primarily use credit-default swaps as a way to hedge their risks. However, banks increasingly said they use credit derivatives in general to aid their trading operations, Fitch said. The study also found that most of the respondents have concerns about a credit crisis, but put the greatest risk beyond a year from now. Among the top 20 traders of credit derivatives, only five increased their use of the securities last year: Morgan Stanley, ABN Amro, Dresdner, Bear Stearns and Royal Bank of Scotland. Nine others reduced their volumes, including Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse and Citigroup. 
Earlier this week, a report from Phoenix Partners Group found that the top investment banks, including Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citi and JPMorgan, have seen significant increases in the cost of protecting their debt against default. Bank of America saw its cost of protection jump 48%, while Citi’s cost rose 45%. The independent banks, including Bear, Goldman, Lehman, Morgan Stanley and Merrill, have seen their cost of protection grow in the range of 20%.

http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/trainwreck.php?Id=181


Re: Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud By mhatmccane on 8/23/2007 2:43 PM
Sent my Email to Boxer & Feinstein today fwiw

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Please limit your comments to 500 characters. For longer comments, use our forums.
Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check   |   Privacy Statement   |   Terms Of Use