November 21, 2008     | Register

The End of the SEC

Location: Blogs Mark Faulk's Blog    
Posted by:   mfaulk 2/3/2007 10:13 AM
Mark this week down on your calendars. In fact, do it Jim Cramer style: take a sharpie and write in big black letters across the entire week “THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE END!”

After years of calls for stock market reform being ignored by the SEC, by Congress, by Wall Street, and by the media, the tide has finally begun to turn. After decades of the average investor being first lured into, then robbed blind in the stock market by Wall Street insiders, major brokerage firms, and hedge funds while our federal officials sat idly by and watched, or worse yet, participated in the splitting up of the loot, there is light at the end of what up until now has been a dark tunnel. A couple of major events this week signaled impending defeat for those who have conspired to rob our country blind in blatant disregard of the very values upon which America was founded.

The first event took place, as is often the case in the world of politics, behind closed doors. A Tuesday afternoon phone call from a person who has long been a behind-the-scenes advocate for returning honesty and integrity to our financial markets first gave me reason to feel renewed hope. This is someone who has been working quietly but tirelessly to help those of us who have been sounding the alarm for years, the same person who helped to set up a Senate Banking Committee hearing over two years ago, only to have it killed by then Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL).

This is the gist of that phone call: Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT), one of the few members of Congress whose hands seem to be clean enough to speak out for America on this issue, has been educating the new Democratic Chairman of the Banking Committee, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) on the issues of stock market fraud. According to Bennett, Dodd is “open to discussing the issue,” and to possibly reopen the hearing into the SEC in the Senate Banking Committee…or should I say to conduct the hearings that were never allowed to take place in 2005. Meetings were set up to discuss the issue, and I forwarded a few relevant articles to give to Sen. Dodd in hopes of showing that even recent tepid efforts by the SEC to deal with fraud were nothing more than slaps on the wrists, fines generally amounting to a fraction of the damage done to companies and shareholders.

Along with the articles to back it up, I sent this short email at 3 in the morning after driving 350 miles from beautiful Lubbock, TX. on a business trip, back home to Middle America, USA:

Here are a couple of recent articles about hedge funds and naked short selling. The issue is finally beginning to receive some mainstream limited press, and the SEC is still essentially doing nothing to stop it. Hedge funds still aren't regulated, and the ones that are caught receive slaps on the wrist.

In recent months, in case after case, the SEC has negotiated fines that have a huge disconnect with the amount of money stolen and the damage done to companies and investors, and usually with the perpetrator "neither denying or admitting guilt." The fines are so small that they have become merely a cost of doing business.

Recently, Eagletech won a decision against the DTC to have an estimated 40,000 pages of documents concerning alleged trading violations released to the company's attorneys, although no charges have been filed yet.

Novastar has had some favorable recent rulings as well, but again, nothing major.

Also, a 21 year-old kid was arrested just last week who hacked into online accounts of investors and used their accounts....and their money....to manipulate the price of 17 penny stocks. One CEO, Hugo Cancio of Fuego Entertainment (FUGO.OB), was on my radio show last week, and described how his stock, which has only 9 million free-trading shares, was manipulated from over $1.40 a share to under .20 in a matter of weeks (the stock actually lost 90% of its value in three trading days), by this same 21 year-old. My main point on the show was that the SEC and the stock market regulators should take this as a sign that something is terribly wrong with the system. If a 21 year-old can do severe damage to 17 companies that easily, imagine what damage "the professional con artists" can, and are, doing.

This is beyond crisis stage, and I firmly believe that the destruction of our incubator companies by unregulated hedge funds, and the moving of massive amounts of our country's wealth offshore, has directly contributed to our country's recent downslide in our position as the world economic leader. Forget about outsourcing our jobs, we're outsourcing our wealth, and killing jobs even before they are created.

This is an issue that rests squarely with the SEC, DTC, and Wall Street, whose neglect and even collusion with hedge funds has resulted in record profits for brokers and obscene wealth for hedge fund managers....at the expense of our country's economic well-being. This is a house of cards, and it's teetering dangerously close to collapse.

Hope this helps....if I can do anything else, please feel free to call me. Thanks for all your help, without people like you, this would be a lost cause, and the damage to our economy would eventually become irreversible.

Did a single email dashed off at 3 in the morning, and the accompanying articles help shed a little light on the problems we face as investors, and America faces as a nation in crisis? It’s hard to say, but I do know this: more than one senator has said that the only way to force action from Congress is to speak out, to let them know that America wants our broken system fixed. Or better yet, dismantled altogether and reassembled in a way that safeguards against fraud, instead of one filled with built-in loopholes.

So here’s the plan: Every American who feels as if they have been wronged by a corrupt stock market, and indeed, every American who understands the financial drain on our country and the loss of jobs and productivity due to victimized companies, needs to raise their voices in unison.

AMERICA NEEDS TO SPEAK OUT, AND SPEAK OUT NOW.

When Senator Chris Dodd returns to work next Monday, he needs to walk into an office that has been buried in emails and phone calls, all calling for one thing – a Senate Banking Committee investigation into fraud on Wall Street, and a thorough investigation into the SEC.

Two other more public events capped off the week that signaled the beginning of the end for the SEC. On Thursday, the day after meetings were held in Washington, two other senators renewed their own attacks on the SEC in a case involving SEC attorney Gary J. Aguirre, who was fired for attempting to question Wall Street kingpin John J. Mack.

Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) said that “The S.E.C. should have taken Mr. Aguirre’s allegations seriously. Instead, it circled the wagons and shot the whistle-blower — an all-too-familiar practice in Washington.” He also said that the SEC’s investigation into the case “was plagued with problems from its beginning to its abrupt conclusion. The termination of Mr. Aguirre by the S.E.C. was highly suspect given the timing and circumstances.”

Senator Arlen Spector (R-PA) saved his harshest words for the SEC.’s inspector general, Walter J. Stachnik. Spector said that in all his years in the Senate he could not recall “an I.G. who said less, did less and was thoroughly inadequate in the investigation.”

An inquiry conducted by the Senate Judiciary and Finance Committees, and released on Thursday, said that “At best, the picture shows extraordinarily lax enforcement by the S.E.C. At worse, the picture is colored with overtones of a possible cover-up.”

Finally, members of Congress are beginning to say what advocates of stock market reform have known all along, that the SEC is as corrupt as the stock market that they are responsible for overseeing. While it is obvious that there are rank-and-file employees who are hardworking and honest, the corruption at the top of the SEC is way beyond criminal, it is treasonous.

AMERICA NEEDS TO SPEAK OUT, AND SPEAK OUT NOW!

To top off a week that will be remembered as one of the turning points in the battle to return honesty and integrity to our financial markets, Overstock.com filed a $3.5 filed a $3.5 billion lawsuit in California state court Friday against 10 of the largest U.S. securities firms, accusing them of participating in a “massive, illegal stock market manipulation scheme” to defraud the company and its shareholders.

Overstock's suit names Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, Bank of America, Bank of New York, Citigroup. Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Merrill Lynch, and UBS as defendants in the lawsuit.

Patrick Byrne has been under relentless attack from a number of financial media reporters, many of whom have ties to hedge funds and short sellers themselves, for joining forces with other stock market reform advocates in calling for a major overhaul of our financial system. That Congress has finally begun to awaken to the problem at the same time that Overstock’s lawsuit is filed is poetic justice for Byrne, and vindication for those who have battled against power, greed, and wealth in an effort to save our country from financial ruin.

As satisfying as this week has been to those of us who have spent years fighting a battle that at times seemed at times to be almost a hopeless cause, we cannot rest in our efforts. Now is the time to sound the alarm even louder than before, to spread the word across our country before it’s too late. Now is the time to let Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd know that this issue will not simply go away.

One last time, in unison:

AMERICA NEEDS TO SPEAK OUT, AND SPEAK OUT NOW!


You can email Senator Chris Dodd at:

http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3128&cat=Opinion

or call him at:

Washington D.C. (202) 224-2823
Fax: (202) 224-1083

Connecticut (860) 258-6940
Permalink  |  Trackback
Comments (27)
Re: The End of the SEC By ginger on 2/3/2007 11:40 AM
As usual, only those with US addresses can contact a US Senator using the pick-lists provided.

I have the same problem trying to apply for membership in Overstock.com ... The pick-list is restricted to the 50 United States and those of us with a Canadian address are apparently not welcome.

Help!
Re: The End of the SEC By Mark Faulk on 2/3/2007 11:53 AM
It's interesting that with a President who is bent on creating a global economy and a "one world" political system, that even those just to the north of us who are affected by our policies can't contact our congressional members. You CAN send him a fax, and I'll see if I can find a direct email address as well.
Re: The End of the SEC By patrick on 3/13/2007 9:25 AM
I wrote a letter to Sen. Dodd about a week and a half ago congratulating him on his appointment and telling him that I think Shelby needs to be investigated. He doesn't belong on the banking committee let alone the Senate. I also told him that the middle class american investors need a HERO to represent us and stop all of the illegal activity in naked shorting that is stealing from us on a daily basis and putting viable companies with honest management out of business.
I also stated it was a daunting task but if he took it on he would have the complete loyalty of the millions of investors hurt by this scheme that the SEC turns a blind eye to. This support might come in handy if he decides to run for President.

I thought it was a great letter but using his site to send it prevents me from making a copy of it. Does anyone have a direct email address for him so I can copy future correspondence?
Re: The End of the SEC By Sean on 2/3/2007 12:19 PM
Mak, bravo and thank you for your seemingly endless efforts to rid us small investors and retirees of this plight, however should not the same if not more attention be focused on the DTCC as well. They seem as comprised if not more so than the SEC, and I believe they work hand in hand. Comments please. Thanks again for all you do.
Re: The End of the SEC By Mike on 2/3/2007 2:03 PM
This is my email to Senator Dodd
Dear Senator,Several years ago I invested money into a penny stock hoping that it would increase in value and allow me to be able to help my kids pay their tuition to college. At this point, all three have graduated from college at considerable expense. Meanwhile, the stock has been tied up because of naked short selling and the SEC doing nothing to help the average working American or in my case a retired teacher who spent thirty five in the classroom teaching about justice,truth, and the American way.
Mark Faulk describes the actions or inaction of the SEC as the counterfeiting of the American Dream.

Sincerely,
Re: The End of the SEC By cynabear on 2/3/2007 2:41 PM
great and relentless work! thanks you, deep thank yous
Re: The End of the SEC By mhelburn on 2/3/2007 3:24 PM
Mark,

Thank you for leading this push. I sent a short e-mail to Senator Dodd with the following sentiment.

" The SEC should have stopped this carnage, but they are worthless."

Is that direct enough?

Mary
Re: The End of the SEC By Mark Faulk on 2/3/2007 4:15 PM
Thanks to everyone who emails Dodd and/or spreads the word. Without everyone's efforts, people like Dave Patch, Bob O'Brien, Bud Burrell, and even Patrick Byrne would be wasting our time shouting into the void.

And I agree....the DTCC is just as culpable as the SEC, but since the SEC is actually paid for by taxpayers' money and under closer oversight of Congress, that's where my focus has been. I have a feeling that if the SEC comes under close scrutiny, it will expose the DTCC and the brokers as well.
Re: The End of the SEC By Arnold on 2/3/2007 4:17 PM
Sent message but it went from the Senators site so I cant send you a copy... sorry
Letter to Senator Dodd By embraceyourinnerhillbilly on 2/3/2007 5:49 PM
Here's what I sent. Hope it's part of a tsunami of emails


The Honorable Chris Dodd
448 Russell Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Tel: (202) 224-2823 Fax: (202) 334-5341

Dear Senator Dodd,

Congratulations on your appointment as the Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. I take heart in the recent changing of the guard, especially seeing you take over for Richard Shelby as the Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. It appeared as if Mr. Shelby was conflicted in his role as to whose interests he was looking after. The American people, or Hedge Funds supported by Wall Street. Mr. Shelby was “inexplicably” biased against reforming Wall Street and the Securities and Exchange Commission, ultimately acting in a manner that protected immeasurable corruption and thievery on the highest levels. Mr. Shelby refused to let this issue proceed to the Senate floor, placing every roadblock in its’ way imaginable. With criminal allies on such high levels constantly blocking such desperately needed reforms, we investors only further see our dreams of a fair and opportunity-oriented America slip through the grasp of our hands.


It is my understanding that you are interested in possibly taking up the case for major reforms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. On behalf of Americans everywhere, I urge you to make this mission a priority. Although I am confident that there will be many influential voices whispering against such reforms, they are the voices of individuals either directly reaping the benefits of such corruption, or those working on their behalf. Common sense tells any objective person that an honest soul could not possibly oppose reforms that make the SEC do their job and curb the massive fraud that's stealing from the American people and their retirement accounts.



I strongly urge you to consider to force the SEC to do their job - enforce the securities laws and a simple thing the SEC could do right now---
No more Fail-To-Delivers allowed for companies on
the RegSHO threshold list for more than 30 days. Force them to be bought in and shares delivered.

Action is needed now, please help reform Wall Street and save American's retirement accounts.

Sincerely,


- - - -


Fred C Dobbs

a fellow American down on his luck...
Re: The End of the SEC By Mark Faulk on 2/3/2007 6:27 PM
Mr. Dobbs:

I feel like I should be standing in the pews shouting out "Amen's" for that email. Very eloquent. And I agree, I hope we have a tsunamai of emails and phone calls as well.
Re: The End of the SEC By teacheric on 2/3/2007 7:17 PM
Here's an address to send an email if you're having trouble elsewhere:

http://www.chrisdodd.com/contact
Re: The End of the SEC By embraceyourinnerhillbilly on 2/3/2007 7:35 PM
A little joke, Fred C Dobbs was the character polayed by humphrey Bogart in Treasure of the Sierra Madre, an American *down on his luck* which is what we'll all be without market reform.
Keep up the good work.
Re: The End of the SEC By embraceyourinnerhillbilly on 2/3/2007 7:35 PM
A little joke, Fred C Dobbs was the character played by humphrey Bogart in Treasure of the Sierra Madre, an American *down on his luck* which is what we'll all be without market reform.
Keep up the good work.
Re: The End of the SEC By Mr. Skeptical on 2/4/2007 10:40 AM
Mark,

I remember feeling the same degree of optimism when Chris Cox was appointed head of the SEC. That turned out to be "misplaced hope". I now suspect everyone involved with these agencies as being part of the scam. What do you know about Senator Dodd? Why do you believe that he will do anything about this massive fraud?

If I thought it would really make a difference, I'd send Sen. Dodd a hundred emails!!!

Mr. Skeptical...
Re: The End of the SEC By ginger on 2/4/2007 8:31 PM
Thanks for this teacheric... http://www.chrisdodd.com/contact.

Done.
Re: The End of the SEC By old duffer on 2/4/2007 8:33 PM
I will be sending my e-mail tomorrow but is not Dodd one of Wall Steets favorite to give money to?
Dodd's campaign finance breakdown By embraceyourinnerhillbilly on 2/4/2007 9:55 PM
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?cid=N00000581

S E N A T O R (D - CT)
Chris Dodd



2001-2006 Total Receipts: $9,805,657
2001-2006 Total Spent: $5,860,527
Cash on Hand: $4,925,913
Debts: $0
Date of last report: December 31, 2006
First elected: 1980
Next election: 2010

Fundraising by Cycle:
2006: $3,695,171
2004: $4,676,379
2002: $1,434,107


Source of Funds:
(How to read this chart / methodology)

Individual contributions
$7,075,031
(72.2%)

PAC contributions
$2,338,034
(23.8%)

Candidate self-financing
$3,000
(0.0%)

Other
$389,592
(4.0%)




PAC Contribution Breakdown
(How to read this chart / methodology)

Business
$1,077,330
(84.8%)

Labor
$145,000
(11.4%)

Ideological/Single Issue
$48,500
(3.8%)




Quality of Disclosure:
(How to read this chart / methodology)

Full Disclosure
$4,067,648
(98.7%)

Incomplete
$6,750
(0.2%)

No Disclosure
$46,717
(1.1%)



Re: The End of the SEC By Mark Faulk on 2/4/2007 9:55 PM
Dave Patch always tells me that it's at least partially about deniability. When it comes down....and it WILL all come down, we need to have given clear notice to those in positions of power, so that we have at least eliminated deniability.

When they say, "I had no idea things were this bad," we have to be able to say "yes you did, and here are the emails to prove it."

Either Dodd fixes it....or we bury him just like we did Senator Shelby. If Shelby runs for re-election, he'll be driven out in disgrace. Dodd gets his chance....and then pays for his actions either way.
Re: The End of the SEC By Pete Stevenson on 2/4/2007 11:33 PM
I just sent my email.
Here's a copy.

------------------------
Dear Senator Dodd,

I urge you to lead the Senate Banking Committee to complete a full investigation into the fraud I see on Wall Street. We need a thorough investigation into the SEC. From all the facts I have seen, I believe the SEC is complicit in the naked shorting of many companies small and large. There are huge numbers of repeated failures to deliver shares of company stock for many many years. I am a shareholder in one such company which has been irreparably harmed by Wall Street's attack on our shares. The SEC shows a blatant and consistent disregard for protecting investor's interests. It is clear to me (and many of my investor friends whom I am sure you are hearing from) that the SEC is under the control of Wall Street and can not be trusted to investigate the major brokerages. Many of the SEC's upper management are biased and they have been speaking with their actions. The SEC should be completely dismanteled and new oversight body should be put in place immediately. The fox is definitely watching over the hen house.

If you do not pursue this matter quickly and vigorously, I will lose all faith in the US markets and I full expect the masses will do the same as soon as they read the news in the coming weeks and hear all the facts now coming out in the mainstream media.

Senator Dodd, you absolutely must get "in front" of this issue and take a leadership role or you will risk appearing to favor the egregious actions of the SEC, Brokerages (and also the DTCC). I expect the mainstream investigative reporters will soon be showing how these organizations have been operating under seemingly no oversight with major fraud occuring right under their noses for years and years. They appear to have been acting together for a long time and there is a strong suspicion that there has been a massive cover-up to hide their biased actions.

I believe that the massive profits that the brokerages have been handing out to their leadership each year (and moreso, this year) has been mainly profits from selling shares of stock that they do not own and pocketing the profits and fees related to the sale. I believe these unheard of profits have been the result of their continued massive naked short selling (NSS) which essentially is counterfeiting shares of stock. I also believe that the Brokerages have had full knowledge that the profit from these counterfeit stock sales would very likely never ever have to be returned since the companies targeted would either go bankrupt under or have no financial resources left with which to defend their company against the huge warchests of the brokerages.

Simply put, this has got to stop ASAP.

If you wish to talk, please feel free to contact me at 908-788-5304.

I fully support any actions you will be taking to fix the US Markets and protect the invetors who, in many cases, are unknowingly being defrauded. The average Joe investor, has NO IDEA this has been and IS still going on...but it is only a matter of time before the mainstream press picks up on this issue then I expect you will find screams coming from all over the US and abroad for comprehensive market reform. We need to restore investor trust in our market system.

I fear it is almost too late, but I do trust you will do the right thing and do it NOW!

Re: The End of the SEC By old duffer on 2/5/2007 7:25 AM
Sent Dodd my e-mail. Will call his number also.Sorry but I really don't trust the man.

But....

Doing my part to cancel 'deniability' in the future if needed.

I agree, don't whine about the problem if you are not willing to step up and lend a hand. Bury his office with e-mails and calls!

old (skeptic) duffer
Re: The End of the SEC By Arnold on 2/5/2007 11:09 AM
Dear Sen. Dodd,

I admire your courage and initiative in many things but this latest endeavor to help in correcting this criminal conspiracy could be the greatest contributuion could be the
greatest help for our economy and maybe it’s very existance as we know it.


Legal shorting, per se, isn't the real problem goodbugs. It is the re-shorting of the short shares that I call pyramiding or naked shorting that IS the problem. It is the current ability of shorts not having to pay back their short that has my focus.

None of us wants to change the basic formula for a "free market". Instead, we want the pressure to build on shorts as shares for shorting to become scarce. I want the existing rule that you can only short 1 share and that it cannot be shorted simultaneously more than once. I want the cuspids that tie to a stock certificate to have meaning. We should all want "some" legal shorting for the myriad of reasons that it creates capital in the very short run. And, under certain circumstances, is a warrented tool in the hands of a responsible financial manager. But, to have it shorted and shorted and shorted some more is unreasonable.

But, when shorting is pyramided or naked, it is extremely distructive. It creates asset wormwood. It hollows out values. Companies have to issue secondaries at values way below economic sense. Worse, there then becomes no need to cover the shorted positon even with fantastic trial results in the case of Dendreon. When DNDN issued their 2 secondaries below $5.50, the shorts took dollars out of our pockets. We did nothing.

So, what I want is for the regulators to dig into the situations where there is excessive shorting. I want them to eliminate all pyramids and naked shorts. The quickest way to sound the alarm is to drop the bombshell of responsibility on the DTC to organize a recall/reissue, (the Depository Transfer Corporation) that must authenticate transactions. Believe me, if the DTC suddenly had to go through the mud created by sloppy transactions enabled by domestic & foreign brokers (are you listening UBS?), shorted shares that did not have to adhere to US Securities Laws, they'd turn to the Large American Brokers and say "fix it, boys or else." These brokers would in turn tighten the screws on their foreign brethren for compliance. (Failure by the foreigners would exclude them from entering into US transactions.)

Now, that would get their collective rearends off the sofa where they are currently parked. Everyone in the equation thinks it is someone elses problem. I've got news for everyone in the equation... it is your problem.

Really, we don't need more regulations. WE NEED THE REGULATORS and THEIR AGENTS TO ENFORCE THE EXISTING LAWS and adapt them to internet capabilities. Hiding behind globalization is no excuse.
My hope is you will prevail in correcting this wrong to so many people.

Sincerely,

Shelly Olmer
Re: The End of the SEC By shelly on 2/5/2007 11:15 AM
Dear Sen. Dodd,

I admire your courage and initiative in many things but this latest endeavor to help in correcting this criminal conspiracy could be the greatest contributuion could be the
greatest help for our economy and maybe it’s very existance as we know it.


Legal shorting, per se, isn't the real problem goodbugs. It is the re-shorting of the short shares that I call pyramiding or naked shorting that IS the problem. It is the current ability of shorts not having to pay back their short that has my focus.

None of us wants to change the basic formula for a "free market". Instead, we want the pressure to build on shorts as shares for shorting to become scarce. I want the existing rule that you can only short 1 share and that it cannot be shorted simultaneously more than once. I want the cuspids that tie to a stock certificate to have meaning. We should all want "some" legal shorting for the myriad of reasons that it creates capital in the very short run. And, under certain circumstances, is a warrented tool in the hands of a responsible financial manager. But, to have it shorted and shorted and shorted some more is unreasonable.

But, when shorting is pyramided or naked, it is extremely distructive. It creates asset wormwood. It hollows out values. Companies have to issue secondaries at values way below economic sense. Worse, there then becomes no need to cover the shorted positon even with fantastic trial results in the case of Dendreon. When DNDN issued their 2 secondaries below $5.50, the shorts took dollars out of our pockets. We did nothing.

So, what I want is for the regulators to dig into the situations where there is excessive shorting. I want them to eliminate all pyramids and naked shorts. The quickest way to sound the alarm is to drop the bombshell of responsibility on the DTC to organize a recall/reissue, (the Depository Transfer Corporation) that must authenticate transactions. Believe me, if the DTC suddenly had to go through the mud created by sloppy transactions enabled by domestic & foreign brokers (are you listening UBS?), shorted shares that did not have to adhere to US Securities Laws, they'd turn to the Large American Brokers and say "fix it, boys or else." These brokers would in turn tighten the screws on their foreign brethren for compliance. (Failure by the foreigners would exclude them from entering into US transactions.)

Now, that would get their collective rearends off the sofa where they are currently parked. Everyone in the equation thinks it is someone elses problem. I've got news for everyone in the equation... it is your problem.

Really, we don't need more regulations. WE NEED THE REGULATORS and THEIR AGENTS TO ENFORCE THE EXISTING LAWS and adapt them to internet capabilities. Hiding behind globalization is no excuse.
My hope is you will prevail in correcting this wrong to so many people.

Sincerely,

Shelly Olmer
Re: The End of the SEC By Sean on 2/15/2007 6:36 AM
Why did it take them 9 years to discover sometthing so blatantently fraudulent? This is why the SEC is and should become OBSOLETE!!



Bear Stearns May Have to Repay Failed Hedge Fund $180 Million

By Otis Bilodeau

Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Bear Stearns Cos. may be ordered today to pay a failed hedge fund as much as $180 million in a court ruling that will help determine how aggressively Wall Street firms police their most lucrative trading clients.

Burton Lifland, the U.S. judge overseeing the bankruptcy of Manhattan Investment Fund Ltd., will decide whether Bear Stearns must return the money it took as the fund slid toward insolvency. Lifland concluded last month that Bear Stearns, one of the biggest brokers to hedge funds, was trying to cover its own potential losses and didn't investigate thoroughly after learning of possible fraud at Manhattan Investment, court filings show.

``Bear Stearns failed to act diligently in a timely manner,'' Lifland said in a Jan. 9 opinion, finding that the New York-based company, the fifth-largest U.S. securities firm, learned as early as December 1998 that fund manager Michael Berger may have been deceiving investors about returns. A hearing in the case is scheduled for today in Manhattan.

A ruling against Bear Stearns would add to the pressure on securities firms to monitor hedge funds, which pay Wall Street about $10 billion annually in fees for prime-brokerage services. Federal regulators are probing whether the securities industry sets strict enough limits when lending to hedge funds, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has said prime brokers should be a ``window'' into their dealings.

``This is going to send shock waves through many prime brokers, because they've been very careful to limit their responsibility for their customers' actions,'' said Michael Missal, a former SEC lawyer and head of the regulatory practice at Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP in Washington. ``They do not want to be seen as insurers for their clients.''

Slice of Profit

For Bear Stearns, a $180 million payment would be equal to almost 9 percent of its $2.05 billion in earnings last year.

Manhattan Investment, which was founded in 1996, collapsed into bankruptcy four years later in ``one of the most egregious and costly frauds in the history of the securities markets,'' the SEC wrote in a bankruptcy court filing submitted last February. Bear Stearns and the trustee appointed to recoup money for investors in the fund have been fighting for six years.

Berger lost almost $400 million of investors' money and deceived them for more than three years with fake account statements, said the SEC, which sued Manhattan Investment for fraud in 2000.

``We are disappointed with the bankruptcy court's decision, believe it is not supported by either the law or the facts and intend to appeal,'' Russell Sherman, a spokesman for Bear Stearns, said in response to Lifland's Jan. 9 opinion.

$10 Billion Business

Wall Street's prime brokers, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, lend securities, process trades and hold assets in custody to help managers run their hedge funds. All the firms divvy up fees of about $10 billion annually, according to Tabb Group, a Westborough, Massachusetts-based consultant.

Hedge funds are lightly regulated investment pools that allow managers to participate substantially in gains on the money invested.

While Bear Stearns did question Berger, the firm failed to verify his explanation for the gap between the positive returns he was reporting to investors and the losses in his account, Lifland wrote in his opinion.

``Bear Stearns was required to do more than simply ask the wrongdoer if he was doing wrong,'' Lifland wrote. ``Diligence requires consulting easily obtainable sources of information that would bear on the truth.''

10-Minute Review

The brokerage finally obtained the fund's financial statements a year later and ``after a 10-minute review'' recognized that Berger had been lying, according to the opinion.

The SEC sued Berger, who is Austrian, in January 2000 and he later pleaded guilty to related criminal charges. He fled the U.S. before sentencing and remains a fugitive. A court-appointed receiver placed the remaining assets of the fund into bankruptcy protection in March 2000.

Bear Stearns had a brokerage agreement with Berger that was standard for the industry. The firm had the right to use any money in the fund's account to cover Berger's open ``short'' positions, or bets that entailed borrowing shares in the anticipation they would fall and become cheaper to replace at a later date.

Bear Stearns did use the fund's money to cover short sales in the year preceding the bankruptcy filing, according to Lifland's opinion.

While the firm was entitled to take the money, bankruptcy rules sometimes allow a failed fund's creditors to reclaim funds paid out during the months leading up to a collapse. If the broker can't show that it took the cash ``in good faith'' and without knowledge that its fund customer was defrauding investors, the creditors can recoup the assets, Lifland wrote.

Bear Stearns' failure to take ``simple steps'' to probe signs of Berger's misconduct undercut the firm's claim that it acted in good faith, the judge ruled last month.

To contact the reporter on this story: Otis Bilodeau in Washington at obilodeau@bloomberg.net .

Last Updated: February 15, 2007 00:20 EST
Re: The End of the SEC By FreddoCazzo on 2/21/2007 1:28 PM
Would it help if I sat on the steps of the capital building in Austin, and picketed? Something kinda like the picketing of the DTCC with the naked shorts that was done a while back.....(good job ms.debi btw!)

Letters are fine and all, but I think there needs to be an en masse of people descending upon the steps of state capital buildings nationwide to let every single senator and congressman/woman know that we are not going away any time soon.....

Maybe then our C.O.S. will not be able to wiggle out of the limelight that he and his cronies have been able to evade ever since the Market Reform has taken its first steps......

Shove this in thier faces, and make sure the media has no choice but to cover nationwide picketing.......

FC,CF.....still Freddo....even more Cazzo!
Re: The End of the SEC By Good Luck with Dodd, bought and paid for. on 2/25/2007 8:50 AM
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00000581&cycle=2006

CHRISTOPHER J. DODD (D-CT)
Top Contributors
1 Bear Stearns $117,400
2 Citigroup Inc $91,750
3 National Westminster Bank $75,500
4 United Technologies $70,250
5 Hartford Financial Services $68,600
6 Lehman Brothers $67,000
7 Goldman Sachs $61,000
8 Morgan Stanley $50,000
9 UBS AG $49,200
10 Credit Suisse Group $46,250
11 American International Group $41,578
12 General Electric $41,330
13 JP Morgan Chase & Co $38,600
14 Prudential Financial $37,650
15 E*TRADE Financial Group $37,250
16 Aetna Inc $34,800
17 Metropolitan Life $33,000
18 Brown Brothers Harriman & Co $32,000
19 Fannie Mae $30,500
20 Purdue Pharma $29,250


CHRISTOPHER J. DODD (D-CT)
Top Industries
The top industries supporting Christopher J. Dodd are:
1 Securities & Investment $993,663
2 Insurance $534,708
3 Lawyers/Law Firms $497,960
4 Real Estate $377,041
5 Commercial Banks $238,000
6 Lobbyists $223,249
7 TV/Movies/Music $211,300
8 Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $172,050
9 Retired $152,000
10 Misc Finance $126,618
11 Defense Aerospace $114,350
12 Business Services $101,000
13 Health Professionals $98,200
14 Pro-Israel $98,150
15 Finance/Credit Companies $88,080
16 Misc Manufacturing & Distributing $78,500
17 Transportation Unions $73,000
18 Health Services/HMOs $69,800
19 Accountants $68,000
20 Public Sector Unions $63,000


Re: The End of the SEC By Mark Faulk on 2/25/2007 11:04 AM
Thanks for this info....I've been compiling information on Dodd, which doesn't give me a lot of confidence in his actions. I might have to blog this later.

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Please limit your comments to 500 characters. For longer comments, use our forums.
Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check   |   Privacy Statement   |   Terms Of Use