January 07, 2009     | Register

NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last?

Location: Blogs Mark Faulk's Blog    
Posted by:   mfaulk 9/26/2006 5:19 PM
In a saga that many thought was dead-on-arrival, the NASD today filed charges against NevWest Securities Corporation of Las Vegas, and company President Sergey Rumyantsev and Vice President Antony M. Santos. In charging the company and its officers with violating NASD's Anti-Money Laundering Rule, they stated that “between January 1, 2003, and May 31, 2005, NevWest failed to file Suspicious Activity Reports (‘SAR’), or cease trading in multiple accounts owned and controlled by JE, NevWest’s customer, regarding over 500 transactions, invo9lving over 250 billion shares of sub-penny stock issued by CMKM Diamonds Inc. (‘CMKM’) totaling over $53 million. In the 28-page complaint, the NASD also charged NevWest with failing to “adequately perform due diligence, file SARs, or cease effecting wire transfers involving $43 million through 139 separate wires from at least 28 of the accounts JE had opened at NevWest to various bank accounts.”

They were the first charges brought in a story that began in late 2002 (or even earlier including the earlier incarnation of CMKM Diamonds), and might have come to an end on October 28, 2005, when Administrative Law Judge Brenda Murray officially revoked CMKM’s (commonly referred to by its trading symbol CMKX) reporting status, after the company withdrew its appeal of Judge Murray’s initial ruling against the company for failure to file required financial reports with the SEC.

However, this was one company that simply refused to die. Bolstered by over 50,000 shareholders and an advocacy group begun by CMKX shareholder John Martin and represented by attorney Bill Frizzell, the CMKX Owners Group worked their way into the SEC hearings, and continued to press for action against the various people involved in what they perceived as a massive fraud extending into every corner of the financial market process, including not only numerous individuals who took advantage of a system rife with loopholes and poorly enforced SEC regulations, but implicating nearly every major brokerage firm in the U.S. and Canada.

In fact, in a letter to then CMKX attorney Donald Stoecklein over a year ago, Owners Group attorney Bill Frizzell called for the company to take legal action against several of the people who he named as being involved in the scheme to defraud tens of thousands of CMKX shareholders, with John Michael Edwards, or “JE,” at the top of the list. He specifically cited the 36 NevWest trust accounts, along with another 20 additional companies that have addresses in Langley, B.C., and owned and controlled by Edwards. In addition to Edwards and NevWest, Frizzell named company auditor Neil Levine (who was brought into CMKX by Edwards), CFO David DeSormeau, “consultant” James Kinney, secretary Ginger Guitierrez, and attorney Brian Dvorak as individuals who were involved in the problems with CMKX.

NevWest President Sergey Rumyantsev said today that “in our perception, we believe that we have fail-safes in effect that go far above and beyond the industry standards. We feel completely wronged in this particular case.” Rumyantsev also questioned the NASD’s action against their company, saying that “we were singled out, why were we the only one charged when hundreds of billions of shares were sold by other brokers?”

Another source close to the story echoed Rumyantsev’s sentiments, citing the serious problems with other major brokerage firms, including Ameritrade and Etrade, and the long and drawn out process of trying to issue stock certificates to bonafide shareholders, many of whom have still not received stock certificates over a year after the company initiated a cert pull in an attempt to determine if there were more shares sold than actually existed. This source asked whether the other offending brokers had filed Suspicious Trading Reports in relation to the well-over a trillion shares that many people claim were fraudulently sold to unsuspecting shareholders.

In the meantime, many questions remain in the CMKX saga. Why has it taken so long for regulatory agencies to take action against those who defrauded over 50,000 shareholders, and why hasn’t the SEC taken any action whatsoever? It was reported last week in a court document involving John Edward’s wife Diana Lee Flaherty’s own stock fraud trial that Edwards himself is still under investigation for stock fraud, and there are unconfirmed reports of a major sting operation targeting dozens of others involved in the CMKX scandal.

In the broader sense, the sheer scope of this scam, and the reported massive selling of counterfeit stock into the market that accompanied it, raises serious questions as to the system of checks and balances that protects our stock market. This reporter is certain that this is only the beginning, and that ultimately, many more people will be brought to justice in this case. Let’s just hope that the investigations don’t stop there, and that the major brokers are held responsible for their part in this financial train wreck, and that the SEC itself is made to answer for their ineptitude and failure to “protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities market.”

To read the NASD complaint filed against NevWest, go to: http://cmkxownersgroup.com/NevWest%20Complaint.pdf

Mark Faulk is the Editor of The Faulking Truth, and the author of the upcoming book about the CMKX story entitled "The Naked Truth: Counterfeiting the American Dream," due out in late 2006. For more information on the book and on the stock market scandal, go to http://www.faulkingtruth.com/, and to pre-order your copy, go to http://www.theownersgroupinc.com/cart/
Permalink  |  Trackback
Comments (12)
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By Roland on 9/27/2006 5:21 AM
JE may be implicit in the fraud but someone gave him the 250B+ shares to sell. Those shares were sold over a long period of time.

Where was the checks and balances in the CMKX headquarters with the Board of Directors?
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By davidn on 9/27/2006 5:33 AM
Read my post on "pre-netting" in Bobo's last thread.

There is x-clearing and CNS, but there is also "pre-netting". Little brokerages like this don't usually clear directly with the DTCC. 90% of brokerages in the US go through large clearing organizations. They "net" prior to doing one big trade with the DTCC.

Since these organizations are not audited or regulated properly, no one knows how many shares they are supposed to have. The DTCC only knows how many they actually have.

All of this pre-netting fraud happens below the surface and isn't seen by the DTCC or SEC and they can play dumb like they didn't know.

The biggest failures were done by clearing firms that "pre-netted" - refco, mjk clearing, adler coleman.

We're all looking for dirty brokerages and x-clearing for the hidden counterfeits and some do indeed reside there, but I believe most live with clearing brokerages and foreign depositories that pre-net before the trade ever hits CNS.
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By Mark Faulk on 9/27/2006 6:21 AM
The problems with CMKX extend into every corner. My feeling is that once the smoke clears that nearly everyone in and around the company will be found to have some degree of responsibility for what happened here. There is plenty of blame to go around.

I agree that that the clearing houses and especially the foreign depositories are the root of a large part of the problem here as well. It really is a matter of a system that is so poorly designed in the first place as to invite fraud, and then just as poorly enforced. Just as in the case of the company, there is plenty of blame to go around....however, the SEC deserves the lion's share onn a regulatory level simply because they make the rules...and they guard the hen house.
Roundtable Regulation SHO Pilot Recap: By newspaper on 9/27/2006 7:38 AM
The second panel was unanimous in its opposition to Regulation SHO. One panelist noted that the infamous "bear raid" scenario of depressing a stock through manipulative shorting, if indeed it exists at all, is much rarer than the opposite scenario of "pump and dump" (or manipulation of a stock price upwards, generally followed by insider selling) and said that short sellers were a natural ally of the SEC in deflating "pump and dumps." Another panelist noted that the tick test (the form of short sale price restriction in use on the NYSE, which forbids a short sale on a downtick in the price) may function as a short-acting circuit breaker by causing moderate congestion in markets. A third panelist observed that the focus of Regulation SHO was downward price manipulation, while no one was focusing on the upward price manipulation that may be caused by open collusion in withholding securities from the lending market.

Panelists spoke out against the locate rule (which requires brokers effecting short sales to follow procedures designed to ensure that they can locate securities to borrow and thus close the short sale), saying that the penalty for naked shorting was too draconian and should be replaced with a series of moderate penalties (perhaps 100-300 bps) aimed at creating a transparent market in securities lending with clear price information. Panelists also discussed the consequences of settlement failures and concerns regarding the effect on corporate governance of unclear share ownership.

At the close of the panel, it remained unclear whether or not the SEC will act on the unanimous recommendation of the economists who served on the panels to repeal the price test restrictions provided under Regulation SHO.

http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=43020&searchresults=1
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By Patchie on 9/27/2006 9:17 AM
Mark,

In reading teh complaint against NevWest, the NASD appears to be going after them for "failing to raise the red flag" on the suspicious activities despite the fact that NevWest was actually trading real certs. I would venture to say that the NASD did in fact have all the red flags they needed by virtue of investor complaints to the NASD and SEC. I could see some very interesting dynamics develop here if the NASD is successful in bringing down NevWest because that could easily open up the door for a lawsuit against the NASD by the shareholders.

Look at the companies involved (PCBM, SRCI, UCAD, CMKX, CMKM). How many complaints, in total were filed by investors to the regulstors on these companies?
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By Mark Faulk on 9/27/2006 10:14 AM
Judgung from the near-obsessive involvement by CMKX shareholders, I'm guessing that the complaints were in the hundreds. I know that Judge Murray introduced numerous letters into the record during the revocation hearing of May 10, 2005. That was after the fact as far as the NevWest issue goes, but it's safe to say that there were probably a lot letters sent before that. Plus, my sources tell me that NevWest officials themselves were in contact with the SEC asking for guidance WHILE shares were being dumped. I didn't include that in my article because NevWest wouldn't comment on it. Fear?
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By tommytoyz on 9/27/2006 2:55 PM
Good blog! Can't add anything to it. These wrecks will get bigger and bigger. Some day, the entire system wobble out of control and the current leaders will be run out of town.
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By mfaulk on 9/27/2006 5:17 PM
Thanks...this is only the beginning in the CMKX roundup. I expect the streets of Las Vegas to be a little less crowded in the near future.
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By mfaulk on 9/27/2006 5:30 PM
Thanks...this is only the beginning in the CMKX roundup. I expect the streets of Las Vegas to be a little less crowded in the near future.
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By mfaulk on 9/27/2006 5:31 PM
Damn..I hate it when it double posts and makes me look like an idiot. I can do that all by myself, thank you very much. It's a conspiracy, I tell ya.
Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By Sean on 9/27/2006 6:26 PM
Mark, if Nev West is such a small player and they were "singled out" because of such and they sold 250 billion. I wonder how much the large players have sold?? Things that make you say hhhhmmmmmnnnnnn!!!! Please review the following for your recollection as to who else might be a Big player (s) in this trist.

...Knight Trading Group, Inc. (March 12, 2004) (Nasdaq: NITE) has posted on this Web site its monthly U.S. equity volume activity for February 2004.

For the month of February 2004, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Index closed up from January 2004 levels by 0.9 percent and 1.2 percent, respectively. During the same period, the Nasdaq Composite Index declined by 1.8 percent.

"In the broader equity markets, February trading dropped off on all the major exchanges, with Nasdaq volumes declining 18 percent and NYSE volumes down 11 percent from the previous month. Knight's volumes in Nasdaq NMS and listed shares also dropped from January to February," stated Thomas M. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer and President of Knight Trading Group. "The market generally considers February to be a weak month, and this February held to that expected pattern. So far in March, market indices have fallen almost to year-end levels."

? Average daily U.S. equity trade volume in February 2004 was 907,000, down 18 percent from 1,103,000 in January 2004, and up approximately 79 percent from 507,000 in February 2003.

? Average daily U.S. equity share volume was 7.50 billion in February 20041, up 62 percent from 4.64 billion in January 2004, and up 552 percent from 1.15 billion in February 2003.

? Average daily dollar value traded was $7.57 billion in January 2004, down 18 percent from $9.3 billion in January 2004, and up 91 percent from 4.0 billion in February 2003.

? There were 19 trading days in February 2004, versus 20 trading days in January 2004, and 19 trading days in February 2003.

1Trading in Pink Sheet stock CMKX in February represented 3.36 billion average daily shares traded, or nearly 44 percent of Knight's average daily volume during the month. CMKX trades at prices in the hundredths of a cent.

February 2004 Monthly Highlights February 2004 January 2004 February 2003
Average Daily Equity Trades (in thousands)
Nasdaq Trades 562 680 323
NASD OTC BB and Other Trades 57 63 17
Listed Trades 288 360 167
Total Average Daily Trades 907 1,103 507

Average Daily Equity Shares (in millions)
Nasdaq Shares 320 459 205
NASD OTC BB and Other Shares 6,910 3,829 769
Listed Shares 276 351 176
Total Average Daily Shares 7,506 4,639 1,150

Average Daily Dollar Volume Traded ($ in millions) 7,570 9,283 3,959



Home Clients Investors Journalists Careers About Knight Subsidiaries Regulatory Affairs
Contacts Cash Equities Equity Options Asset Management How the Trade Gets Done
How Knight Makes It Happen Site Map

Re: NASD Charges NevWest in CMKX Saga...Justice at Last? By bbhindyou on 9/28/2006 7:57 AM
It couldn't be possible that the cmkx dividend for gemm could pull a global links could it?
They wouldn't think of saying" Oop's happened again " would they?
I ordered all my certs and am waiting for the last cert 'fee' to clear then the account at the brokerage goes as well.
ALL MY CERTS IN EVERYTHING I HAVE.
It may not be much but I recently read a single mosquito cant't kill you ,but if a person is left exposed the combined effect of a swarm of them can kill.
This drop from this bug has been taken.From me to you dtcc. Hope it itches.
I won't leave anything at a brokerage.
I don't know if there is such a thing as a safe distance but I won't stay sitting on a bomb.

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Please limit your comments to 500 characters. For longer comments, use our forums.
Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check   |   Privacy Statement   |   Terms Of Use